Skip to main content

Hearts

Hearts Game Cover
67%Game Brain Score
graphics, humor
monetization, gameplay
67% User Score Based on 620 reviews

Platforms

TabletPhone
Buy NowGet on Play Store
Hearts Game Cover

About

Hearts is a single player action game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Hearts is a classic card game featuring challenging professional computer opponents and exciting online multiplayer modes. Players aim to avoid collecting certain cards to keep their score low while strategically outplaying rivals. With smooth gameplay and competitive options, it offers a great Hearts experience for both solo and social play.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Hearts screenshot
Skip User Reviews

67%
Audience ScoreBased on 620 reviews
graphics5 positive mentions
monetization43 negative mentions
  • The game is engaging and offers a fast-paced experience without intrusive ads, making it enjoyable to play.
  • Players appreciate the ability to chat and interact with others during gameplay, enhancing the social aspect of the game.
  • The app provides a good challenge with a solid AI, making it a fun way to improve skills and strategy.
  • The game is criticized for its algorithm, which many players believe is rigged, leading to unrealistic card distributions and frequent losses.
  • The rating system rewards players for second and third places, which encourages suboptimal play and detracts from the competitive nature of the game.
  • Players report issues with the administration, including arbitrary bans and a lack of moderation in the chat, leading to a toxic environment.
  • monetization
    57 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the minimal and non-intrusive ad placements, primarily appearing between games rather than during play. However, some users express frustration over forced ads and misleading promotions, leading to a desire for an ad-free experience, which can be achieved through a paid option. Overall, while some players enjoy the game without excessive interruptions, others find the ad experience annoying and disruptive.

    • “Very appreciative of having no ads.”
    • “Very good with no ads (big plus) and can customize the appearance and rules of the game.”
    • “Awesome and no advertising interruptions between games.”
    • “The updates with the hard-to-get past forced ads after each game is a pain.”
    • “New forced ads having to click to end is ridiculous.”
    • “Way too many ads and fake ads that say update now to force you to install another app.”
  • graphics
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some players praising them as "top shelf" and "great," while others criticize them as "clunky," "poor," and in need of modernization. Many users appreciate the smooth gameplay and minimal ads, but there are consistent calls for improvements to the overall visual quality and user interface. Overall, the graphics seem to be a divisive aspect, with a significant number of players expressing dissatisfaction.

    • “I love this game, simple interface, smooth graphics in play, lots of online players, very few ads in-between, robust chat moderation and altogether very enjoyable.”
    • “It is challenging and the graphics are top shelf.”
    • “Love the graphics and rules of the game!”
    • “Very bad graphics, extremely choppy gameplay, rude players, disgusting conversations in public chat and the leaderboard is not a true leaderboard.”
    • “Graphics look the very same as it did several years ago.”
    • “Very poor graphics and choppy gameplay.”
  • gameplay
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players finding the auto-completion feature detracting from strategic decision-making and leading to a lack of player error impact. While the online experience is praised for its accuracy and challenge, particularly at higher ratings, the single-player mode is criticized for being too easy. Additionally, concerns about slow pacing, poor graphics, and choppy mechanics suggest that the overall gameplay experience needs significant improvement.

    • “Beating people from all over the world... the actual gameplay is very accurate... but against the computer is too easy... it gets quite good at online around 80% rating... really hard... but there really should be something special for reaching 100.”
    • “Faster game due to all the mechanics; great programming.”
    • “Gameplay feels weird the way it autocompletes hands for you; I don't like it because it leaves no room for winning off of player error or poor choices. It seems to assume the hand will play out perfectly.”
    • “Gameplay takes forever.”
    • “Very poor graphics and choppy gameplay.”
  • humor
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is described as "dumb funny," providing enjoyment without being overly annoying. However, players have expressed frustration with the game's strict moderation policies, which can lead to bans for even light-hearted jokes. Overall, the humor is appreciated, but the enforcement of rules can dampen the experience.

    • “It's dumb funny more than dumb annoying.”
    • “I found this game very funny and enjoyable.”
    • “Funny that I never got the 2 of clubs, but I can certainly get the A K Q of spades and the A K Q J 9 8 7 6 5 of hearts.”
  • atmosphere
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere is characterized as extremely hostile and toxic, creating a sense of danger and unease for players.

    • “The atmosphere is very hostile and toxic.”
    • “The game lacks any immersive atmosphere, making it feel empty and lifeless.”
    • “I found the atmosphere to be overwhelmingly dark and oppressive, which detracted from my enjoyment.”
  • optimization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the app is mixed; while it is user-friendly and effectively tracks statistics and online performance, many users report experiencing poor overall performance.

    • “Easy to use, keeps a good record of statistics, and even the online performance is good!”
    • “The app suffers from poor performance.”
    • “Optimization issues lead to frequent lag and crashes.”
    • “The game runs poorly on various devices, making it frustrating to play.”
  • stability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users report a high level of stability, with no glitches or technical issues encountered during gameplay.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Hearts

Skip Games Like Hearts

Games Like Hearts

Euchre 3D Card Game Online ImageEuchre 3D Card Game Online ImageEuchre 3D Card Game Online Image
86%16.1kreviews

Euchre 3D Card Game Online

Action
TabletAndroidPhone+1
Spades Masters - Card Game ImageSpades Masters - Card Game ImageSpades Masters - Card Game Image
59%1kreviews

Spades Masters - Card Game

2021Action
TabletAndroidPhone+3
Spades ImageSpades ImageSpades Image
61%1kreviews

Spades

Action
TabletPhone
Spades: Classic Card Games ImageSpades: Classic Card Games ImageSpades: Classic Card Games Image
76%10kreviews

Spades: Classic Card Games

Action
TabletAndroidPhone+1
Spades - Classic Card Game ImageSpades - Classic Card Game ImageSpades - Classic Card Game Image
87%9.9kreviews

Spades - Classic Card Game

Action
TabletAndroidPhone+1
More games like Hearts
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Hearts is a action game.

Hearts is available on Phone and Tablet.

Hearts was developed by KARMAN Games (CY) LTD.

Hearts has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Hearts is a single player game.

Similar games include Euchre 3D Card Game Online, Spades Masters - Card Game, Spades, Spades: Classic Card Games, Spades - Classic Card Game and others.