Skip to main content

Grand War: War Strategy Games

Grand War: War Strategy Games Game Cover
79%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
monetization, stability
79% User Score Based on 1,300 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneMobile Platform
Buy NowGet on Play Store
Grand War: War Strategy Games Game Cover

About

Grand War: War Strategy Games is a single player strategy game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Commander! The war has begun! We need your strategy to conquer the world!

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Grand War: War Strategy Games screenshot
Grand War: War Strategy Games screenshot
Grand War: War Strategy Games screenshot
Grand War: War Strategy Games screenshot
Grand War: War Strategy Games screenshot
Skip User Reviews

79%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,300 reviews
graphics38 positive mentions
monetization29 negative mentions
  • The game features stunning graphics and engaging gameplay that keeps players hooked.
  • Players appreciate the strategic depth and variety of units, making each battle feel unique.
  • The developers are responsive to feedback and are actively working on updates to improve the game.
  • Many players find the game to be heavily pay-to-win, especially in later levels where progress becomes nearly impossible without spending money.
  • There are frequent bugs and glitches, particularly in the conqueror mode, which can disrupt gameplay.
  • The difficulty spikes significantly at certain levels, leading to frustration among players who feel they cannot progress without purchasing upgrades.
  • graphics
    51 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in the game receive a mixed response from users, with many praising them as stunning, gorgeous, and high-quality, particularly in relation to the game's strategic elements and character designs. However, some players express dissatisfaction, describing the graphics as merely decent or in need of improvement, particularly regarding troop upgrades and overall polish. Overall, while the graphics are generally well-received, there are calls for enhancements to elevate the visual experience further.

    • “The graphics are amazing and the unit descriptions and various units for the countries are also cool to look at!”
    • “Stunning graphics.”
    • “Very good, great graphics & very well laid out.”
    • “Bad graphics, bad setup, and a waste of space and money.”
    • “The graphics and characters need improving.”
    • “Poor graphics, low budget.”
  • gameplay
    46 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for its engaging mechanics, ease of mastery, and strategic depth, reminiscent of classic titles like "Battle Isle." However, it faces criticism for a lack of diverse game modes, limited building options, and issues with saving progress, which detracts from the overall experience. While many players find it fun and immersive, concerns about pay-to-win elements and slow pacing in certain aspects have been noted.

    • “Easy to master both gameplay and controls.”
    • “This is a very good game that's fun to play, especially once you have figured out the mechanics.”
    • “Well made, mechanics are simple and easy to understand.”
    • “Problem with gameplay is: there are only missions (nothing else is detected), gameplay must be fast because there is a low number of turns. The speed of the game cannot be changed in the options, the game doesn't have auto play, and not many buildings are available (just fortresses).”
    • “It has a good foundation and gameplay, but it is destroyed by being pay-to-win.”
    • “A boring strategy game with no thrill and the gameplay is slow with the combat.”
  • story
    45 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is set against a backdrop of historical events, particularly the Napoleonic Wars, which some players find educational and engaging. However, many reviews highlight issues with mission difficulty and repetitive gameplay, leading to frustration as players encounter paywalls and unbalanced challenges, especially after the initial missions. While the storyline has potential, the execution suffers from unclear objectives and gameplay mechanics that detract from the overall experience.

    • “Storyline is educational and correct to the period.”
    • “It's nice in the campaigns but in Conqueror, it does show the story of the Napoleonic Wars, like all of Europe against France, and using true historical battles like the Battle of Jena.”
    • “Excellent gameplay for anyone who is looking for an epic dynamic with a quality story.”
    • “However, the storyline should be more historically accurate, and there are minor dialogue errors. I really hope in future updates rewards are at a larger amount because an individual will need a lot of gold and medals throughout the game.”
    • “Ok game, but missions are the same over and over again; nothing really is new anymore.”
    • “A good game, but if you completely get done with all the things you need to do in a mission, it still won't let you win.”
  • monetization
    42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has received mixed reviews, with players noting that while in-game purchases are optional, there is a significant push for watching ads to earn rewards. Many users express frustration over the slow accumulation of premium currency through ads, the high frequency of ad requirements for daily tasks, and occasional issues with ads not loading. However, some players appreciate the option to play without spending money, highlighting that while ads are present, they do not always interrupt gameplay significantly.

    • “Fun and worth it to do some in-game purchases, but not necessary to win.”
    • “Really good fun to play with lots of help at the beginning - in-game purchases don't get in the way and certainly play a background role.”
    • “Great game, no ads, very addictive once you get the hang of it.”
    • “However, my only gripe is the push for in-game purchases and the meager amount of medals you get.”
    • “However, the daily goals are always linked to watching 5 ads a day, and I am lucky if I can watch 1 a day, so I cannot get upgrade material or complete daily tasks, making it impossible to upgrade enough.”
    • “Typical money-draining game... overpriced and overrated. Why on earth do you developers charge so much? After all, you gain money from advertisements and fleece people for medals or gems, yet you charge so much for this and that. Stop overcharging, especially when you have advertisements in games.”
  • stability
    19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is a mixed bag, with many users reporting frequent glitches and freezes that hinder gameplay, particularly during battles and troop management. While some players experience minimal issues and enjoy the game, the overall consensus highlights significant technical problems that detract from the experience, leading to frustration and calls for improvements.

    • “It has huge potential for future developments, is bug-free, easy to play offline, and is also free of ads.”
    • “There are no glitches, which is why I am giving this a five-star rating.”
    • “My main complaints are 1) the game is occasionally 'buggy' (charges you medals but doesn't let you back out, locks your troops in a level you already finished, or doesn't 'heal' your troops), 2) it's definitely designed for you to pay cash for upgrades (just a little tight), and 3) it needs more levels.”
    • “I've had issues with conqueror mode where there are constant glitches, at times there are issues with troop recovery, purchasing troops, adding generals, map mode before battles & the battles themselves.”
    • “Game play ok, but the game constantly freezes and I have to restart by reloading the game; this happens each round.”
  • grinding
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews on grinding indicate a mixed experience; while some players find the grinding minimal and not overly burdensome, others feel it is tedious and offers low value, particularly criticizing the high costs of in-game purchases. Overall, the perception of grinding varies significantly among users, with some appreciating the lack of grind while others see it as a frustrating aspect of gameplay.

    • “The grinding in this game feels rewarding and not overly tedious.”
    • “I appreciate how the grind is balanced; it keeps me engaged without feeling like a chore.”
    • “The progression system makes grinding enjoyable, as each level feels like a meaningful achievement.”
    • “Also, grinding is really low value, and paying for coins and medals is super expensive, so they won't go far.”
    • “This is just tedious and feels like a burden whenever I play.”
    • “Minimal grinding required.”
  • humor
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is largely derived from its "hilariously bad" English translation, which many players find adds to the overall enjoyment. Despite the language issues, the game is described as a very funny and enjoyable experience, with no technical problems reported.

    • “The English usage isn't so great, but it adds humor.”
    • “Simply a very funny and enjoyable experience playing this game with zero issues and no glitching... brilliant! ”
    • “Only four stars due to the often hilariously bad English translation.”
  • music
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is highly praised, with users noting its quality and historical relevance, particularly in relation to France's wars and Napoleon. The background tracks enhance the gaming experience, although some players express a desire to know the specific names of the compositions used, especially during key battles. Overall, the combination of excellent graphics and music contributes positively to the game's appeal.

    • “This is a good mind-thinking game, great music, and this game is made with the history of France's wars and Napoleon.”
    • “Excellent, love it! I only wish I knew the name of the music they play in the background of the Austrian battle Blenheim.”
    • “Very good graphics and music.”
  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The latest update has significantly improved the game's performance, leading to a more optimized experience for players.

    • “The new update significantly improved the game's performance.”
    • “I noticed a remarkable enhancement in optimization after the latest patch.”
    • “The game runs smoother than ever thanks to the recent optimizations.”
  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express a desire for increased replayability through the addition of more playable countries, indicating that the current options may feel limited and could benefit from greater variety.

    • “I hope you can add more countries that are playable.”
    • “The game lacks variety, making it hard to find motivation for a second playthrough.”
    • “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to replay.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Grand War: War Strategy Games

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Grand War: War Strategy Games is a strategy game.

Grand War: War Strategy Games is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

Grand War: War Strategy Games was developed by Joynow Studio.

Grand War: War Strategy Games has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Grand War: War Strategy Games is a single player game.