GraFi Lunar

About GraFi Lunar

GraFi Lunar is a single player casual simulation game. It was developed by Blender Games and was released on January 3, 2020. It received neutral reviews from players.

GraFi Lunar - casual, colorful, minimalist, physical puzzle with traps, treadmills, portals, dragons and changing gravity.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip Games Like GraFi Lunar

Looking for games like GraFi Lunar? Here are top casual simulation recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with GraFi Easter, GraFi Valentine or Data mining 3.

GraFi Easter

2020

Casual Simulation

GraFi Valentine

2020

Casual Simulation

Data mining 3

2018

Casual Simulation

Data mining 4

2018

Casual Simulation

45%14reviews

GraFi 2

2019

Casual Simulation

43%13reviews

GraFi 4

2019

Casual Simulation

Chocolate makes you happy: St.Patrick's Day

2019

Casual Simulation

Data mining 7

2019

Casual Simulation

53%21reviews

Chocolate makes you happy 7

2018

Casual Simulation

44%11reviews

Chocolate makes you happy: Valentine's Day

2019

Casual Simulation

More games like GraFi Lunar

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

46%Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

emotional3 positive mentions

story3 negative mentions

Good graphics that are clean and presentable without any bugs.
Simple one-click control and reliable physics make the gameplay accessible.
Offers easy achievements for casual players and achievement collectors.

Game feels like a reskinned version of previous installments with little innovation.
Short playtime with no replay value and a looping soundtrack that gets old quickly.
Inconsistent mechanics and frustrating trial/error gameplay can lead to annoyance.

story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 40% neutral mentions, 60% negative mentions
The reviews indicate a strong dissatisfaction with the story, with users claiming it is either nonexistent or poorly executed, even comparing it unfavorably to other narratives like "Twilight." Overall, the consensus is that the story fails to engage or resonate with players.
- “What story?”
- “No story.”
- “Twilight was a better love story than this.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25% positive mentions, 25% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions
The gameplay features a mix of new mechanics introduced at various stages, but it suffers from inconsistency, which can detract from the overall experience.
- “It introduces new mechanics every couple of stages.”
- “Game with inconsistent mechanics.”
- “It's just gameplay.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 67% negative mentions
The music in the game features a themed soundtrack that complements the gameplay, but players find the looping nature of the tracks can become repetitive over time. Additionally, some users noted that the music resumes upon returning to the main menu, even if they have turned it down.
- “Flip gravity to move the ball to the end while avoiding various obstacles while humming to themed music.”
- “The looping soundtrack gets old.”
- “Even if you turn down the music, it will play again when you enter the main menu.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users generally find that the game has limited replayability, citing its short length and lack of incentives to revisit once completed.
- “The game is short and offers no replay value.”
- “Once you finish it, there's really no reason to play again.”
- “I found the lack of replayability disappointing.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization strategy of the game has been criticized as a cheap and scammy cash grab, with users suggesting that better free alternatives are available on mobile platforms, highlighting a negative perception of its value on Steam.
- “You can play better games than this for free on mobile, but the developers are running a cheap and scammy cash grab on Steam for this bundle, worsening the shovelware.”
- “The monetization model feels exploitative, with constant prompts to spend money on features that should be included in the base game.”
- “It's frustrating to see a game that could be enjoyable marred by aggressive monetization tactics that prioritize profit over player experience.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
Players find the emotional aspect of the game to be impactful, as the unpredictability of the "bad moving zones" creates moments of tension and relief. This dynamic fosters a sense of attachment and investment in the gameplay experience, as players navigate the challenges and celebrate their successes. Overall, the emotional engagement is heightened by the game's ability to evoke a range of feelings through its mechanics.
- “The game took me on an emotional rollercoaster, making me feel deeply connected to the characters and their struggles.”
- “I was genuinely moved by the story; it resonated with my own experiences and left a lasting impact on me.”
- “The emotional depth of the narrative made me reflect on my own life choices, and I found myself tearing up during key moments.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions
The graphics have been criticized for their notably low quality, with users pointing to screenshots that highlight these deficiencies.
- “Graphics are deplorably low quality, as the screenshots show.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be somewhat excessive, with some describing it as "a little grindy" and others suggesting that it requires significant time investment, possibly even the use of macros, to endure.
- “You'll need a second life, maybe some macros, and a will to live for grinding.”
- “It's a little grindy.”