Golden Bros

About

Golden Bros is a single player casual strategy game. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Golden Bros" is a 3vs3 Battle Royale game where players choose unique characters with special abilities to outsmart opponents. Fast-paced action and strategic gameplay combine in this multiplayer experience. Join forces with friends or take on rivals in this exciting and engaging game.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

54%

Audience ScoreBased on 241 reviews

graphics10 positive mentions

stability6 negative mentions

The game features a variety of heroes to choose from, allowing for different play styles and experimentation.
Great visuals and sound effects enhance the overall gaming experience.
The game is easy to play and serves as a fun pastime for casual gamers.

The controls are overly simplistic and can be frustrating, especially in competitive modes.
Many players experience bugs, crashes, and issues with matchmaking, leading to a frustrating gameplay experience.
The game has a portrait mode that makes it difficult to control, and the gameplay can become repetitive and boring.

graphics
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
35%
15%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the visuals, character designs, and sound effects as great and unique. However, some users report issues such as lag, glitches, and disorganization in the graphics, suggesting that improvements are needed. While the game is visually appealing, there are calls for better optimization and enhancements to the overall graphical experience.
- “Great visuals and easy to navigate across the entire game.”
- “The graphics and characters are unique and great.”
- “Good graphics and enjoyable to play.”
- “I have to lower my graphic settings from default because of lag and slowdown.”
- “The graphics are horrible, the game glitches out so you can't play sometimes.”
- “Experiencing a graphic distortion on my mobile phone whenever I launch the app.”
gameplay
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
60%
15%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players enjoying its casual, user-friendly controls and unique mechanics, while others criticize it for being repetitive, unbalanced, and buggy. Many users express dissatisfaction with the reliance on a finger-release mechanic for attacks, deeming it unsuitable for competitive play. Overall, while the game shows potential with its graphics and sound, significant improvements are needed in gameplay mechanics and balance to enhance player engagement.
- “It's a very user-friendly game, and the way it is presented in its gameplay is impressive.”
- “Fun to play and has unique mechanics.”
- “Honestly, it has great potential and fun gameplay, but the game is a bit buggy as of now.”
- “Hate the gameplay.”
- “I've never liked games where the whole gameplay is based on releasing your finger to attack.”
- “The graphics are great but the gameplay is very redundant; I found it a boring game.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, with numerous bugs, glitches, and the presence of bots and inactive players detracting from the experience. While it shows potential and offers enjoyable gameplay, the current state is marred by frequent technical problems that hinder playability.
- “The game is buggy, full of bots and AFK players.”
- “Honestly, it has great potential, fun gameplay, but the game is a bit buggy as of now.”
- “The graphics are horrible, the game glitches out so you can't play sometimes.”
character development
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Character development in the game is visually appealing, with well-designed characters and graphics, but is hindered by subpar voice acting and a rushed gameplay experience. Players express frustration over the pay-to-win mechanics, suggesting that financial investment is necessary to compete effectively, which detracts from the overall character progression. Overall, while the potential for deeper character development exists, it feels underutilized due to these issues.
- “The character design is fine, but I'm not a fan of their voice acting.”
- “Pay to win soon turns into pay to earn; you need to spend at least a minimal amount of money to get stronger. Otherwise, you won't be able to compete with other players. I love the character designs and graphics, though the gameplay is too short. It feels rushed; they should have taken more time and thought, as it could have had a lot of potential.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The game requires further optimization to meet the standards expected for competitive play, as users feel it currently falls short in this area.
- “The game needs more optimizations if it is supposed to be designed for competitive play.”
- “The overall experience would benefit from further optimization.”
- “Needs more optimizations if this is supposed to be designed for competitive play.”
- “Needs to be more optimized.”
monetization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The monetization strategy has been criticized as a blatant cash grab, suggesting that the company prioritizes profit over player experience.
- “Another company trying to make a quick cash grab.”
- “The monetization strategy feels overly aggressive and detracts from the overall experience.”
- “It's frustrating to see so many features locked behind paywalls.”