Skip to main content
【GO HOME(1.04)】 Game Cover

About

【GO HOME(1.04)】 is a single player survival simulation game with a horror theme. It was developed by Kobayashi (小林) Games and was released on August 2, 2025. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

This is a free 3D horror game distribution site. My name is Ichimatsu Toshiyo, an Ichimatsu doll who makes games, videos, and music . "GO HOME" is the first 3D game we have produced, and it is a game in which the main character, Mozaiko Suzuki, goes home. It's a short game that can be completed in just under an hour, making it perfect for live commentary !! Game Tips …

Skip User Reviews

78%
Audience ScoreBased on 90 reviews
music11 positive mentions
gameplay3 negative mentions

  • The game features unique art direction and a captivating soundtrack that enhances the overall experience.
  • It offers a bizarre and surreal horror experience that some players find intriguing and enjoyable.
  • The game has moments of genuine scares and a chaotic atmosphere that can be entertaining for those who appreciate unconventional horror.
  • The gameplay is plagued by bugs, poor optimization, and frustrating mechanics that detract from the overall experience.
  • Many players find the game to be extremely short and lacking in replayability, making it feel overpriced for its content.
  • The lack of clear objectives and confusing gameplay can lead to frustration, with some players feeling lost and unable to progress.
  • music
    16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is widely praised for being catchy, fitting, and enhancing the overall atmosphere, with standout tracks that players would enjoy even outside of gameplay. Many reviewers highlight the impressive art direction that complements the music, creating a memorable experience, although some note that the volume can be excessively loud during certain sequences. Overall, the soundtrack is considered a significant strength of the game, contributing to its surreal and immersive horror aesthetic.

    • “Music is surprisingly good and catchy.”
    • “Great art direction, music, some good scares (mostly jumpy).”
    • “The music is always fitting and partially something I would listen to in my free time.”
    • “Wow, this here is a screwed-up horror game with those surreal graphics and classic Japanese aesthetic. Also, please do me a favor and lower the game volume, as the first level chase has very loud music.”
    • “Also, where is the soundtrack?”
    • “Because of the style, creatures, and music.”
  • graphics
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game are characterized by a unique surrealism and a classic Japanese aesthetic, which many players find appealing despite some technical issues. However, there are frequent graphical glitches and limited settings, requiring a decent graphics card for optimal performance. Overall, while the visuals are a highlight, they may not perform well on lower-end PCs, and players have expressed a desire for more customizable graphic options.

    • “Wow, this is a screwed-up horror game with surreal graphics and a classic Japanese aesthetic.”
    • “In this game, the visuals are definitely more important than the gameplay itself.”
    • “It has a very unique art style and presentation.”
    • “Add actual graphic settings for the love of God!!!!”
    • “The controls feel delayed, the graphics glitch all the time, and even the menus are confusing to navigate.”
    • “A variety of graphical glitches and weird animations (sometimes a stylistic choice though) may make this off-putting to some people.”
  • story
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating its depth and originality, while others criticize its poor execution and lack of clarity, particularly due to untranslated content. Many find the narrative difficult to follow or lacking direction, leading to confusion about the game's overall meaning. Despite these issues, some players express enjoyment of the story's themes and characters, suggesting that it may resonate with those willing to engage deeply with the content.

    • “This game was very good; it was very hard too, and I love the story, the monsters, and the main character.”
    • “If you're looking for original art and a story that's fairly easy to resonate with, you should give it a try or watch a walkthrough like I did.”
    • “You might think the game makes no sense at the beginning, but as the story unfolds, you will (hopefully) find the joy of this game.”
    • “The story is also told poorly, and the parts of it that seemed important were not translated into English, so I have no idea what this game was even about.”
    • “There is no story, no directions, and no clear method of how to get through the levels, yet the game punishes you for even the slightest mistake.”
    • “I don't see much of a story or reasoning here, aside from the goal to reach your apartment.”
  • gameplay
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of gohome is criticized for its frustrating mechanics, confusing objectives, and a trial-and-error approach that feels unfinished and often leads to game-breaking bugs. While the environments and character designs are intriguing, the overall experience is marred by mean-spirited traps and a lack of polish, making it difficult to justify the game's price.

    • “Each of gohome's levels is filled with mean-spirited traps, nebulous objectives, and grating mechanics.”
    • “The environments and character designs had me intrigued through most of the game, but the terrible gameplay had me irritated throughout all of it.”
    • “Along with looking and feeling like it is unfinished, the game also has a confusing and frustrating trial-and-error style to the gameplay.”
  • optimization
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received mixed feedback, with some players noting significant issues such as poor performance and FPS drops, while others appreciate its unique qualities and are willing to overlook these shortcomings. Overall, many agree that the game requires further optimization to enhance the experience, especially considering its price point.

    • “Luckily, I haven't had any major problems with the optimization, aside from just some FPS drops.”
    • “Needs optimization, but I like weird unique games like these, so it gets a pass.”
    • “Sometimes you really do have to ignore the gameplay and performance in favor of everything else.”
    • “I'll start off by saying this game is pretty poorly optimized.”
    • “5$-8$ is respectable, once it's optimized.”
  • stability
    4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, graphical glitches, and broken mechanics that detract from the overall experience. While some find humor in the glitches and appreciate the game's challenging nature, many consider it overpriced for its current state.

    • “It is buggy, broken, and utterly miserable to play.”
    • “Way overpriced for such a buggy and broken mess.”
    • “A variety of graphical glitches and weird animations (sometimes a stylistic choice though) may make this off-putting to some people.”
  • replayability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game is criticized for its lack of replayability, being extremely short and easily completed in a few minutes, primarily due to repetitive trial-and-error learning. However, some players still find it enjoyable enough to revisit occasionally despite its limitations.

    • “The game is very fun to check out again once in a while, even though it lacks replayability.”
    • “Despite its short length, the game offers a unique experience that encourages players to revisit it.”
    • “The engaging mechanics and varied challenges make it worthwhile to replay the game multiple times.”
    • “The game is extremely short with zero replayability and can be completed in a few minutes, were it not for the endless, repetitive learning of how the game works through trial and error.”
    • “Though the game does not have replayability, it's still fun to check again once in a while because this game is very enjoyable.”
  • humor
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's humor is highlighted by amusing scenarios, such as a woman chasing players with a loud piano, and the presence of entertaining glitches. Overall, it combines challenging gameplay with moments that provoke laughter, making for a fun experience.

    • “The funny woman chases you with a very loud piano.”
    • “Some of the glitches are hilarious, plus the game makes you think - it's difficult, but fun.”
  • character development
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    While the character designs and environments captivated players, the overall gameplay experience detracted from the enjoyment, suggesting that character development may not have been fully realized or impactful.

  • atmosphere
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The atmosphere of the game is highly praised, with users highlighting the excellent combination of great music and good art that enhances the overall experience.

    • “The music is great, the art is good, and the atmosphere is excellent!”
    • “The immersive environment truly pulls you in, making every moment feel alive.”
    • “The haunting soundtrack combined with stunning visuals creates an unforgettable atmosphere.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy 【GO HOME(1.04)】

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

【GO HOME(1.04)】 is a survival simulation game with horror theme.

【GO HOME(1.04)】 is available on Windows.

【GO HOME(1.04)】 was released on August 2, 2025.

【GO HOME(1.04)】 was developed by Kobayashi (小林) Games.

【GO HOME(1.04)】 has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its music but disliked it for its graphics.

【GO HOME(1.04)】 is a single player game.