Galactic Battles

About Galactic Battles

Galactic Battles is a single player shooter game. It was developed by Dmitriy Uvarov and was released on January 31, 2018. It received negative reviews from players.

Galactic Battles is a complex 2D top-down space shooter in which you have to fight with alien invaders.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip Games Like Galactic Battles

Looking for games like Galactic Battles? Here are top shooter recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Really Trash Game, Star Advent or Expelled.

49%16reviews

Really Trash Game

2020

Shooter

57%75reviews

Star Advent

2018

Action Adventure

47%33reviews

Expelled

2017

Platformer

Cyberoque

2018

Casual Platformer

RUN OR FIGHT

2020

Action Adventure

43%36reviews

Defendoooooor!!

2017

Arcade Platformer

Robert: Space Stories and Battles

2022

Casual Role Playing

62%40reviews

Girl Blonde

2017

Casual Platformer

73%32reviews

Hell Green Blue

2022

Action

33%45reviews

Psi Project

2017

Shooter

More games like Galactic Battles

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

32%Audience ScoreBased on 38 reviews

gameplay3 negative mentions

Accessible and straightforward gameplay that is suitable for newcomers and players seeking a simple retro arcade shooter experience.
Low system requirements and smooth performance on most setups.
Includes Steam achievements which add some incentive for completionists despite some issues.

Controls are clunky and unresponsive, often leading to player frustration.
Broken or non-functional achievements undermine player motivation and overall quality perception.
Very limited content with repetitive gameplay, lack of depth, poor visuals, no customization options, and minimal progression making sessions feel tedious and uninspired.

gameplay
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
18% positive mentions, 55% neutral mentions, 27% negative mentions
The gameplay is a basic, repetitive 2D shoot 'em up focused on surviving enemy waves with limited variety and environmental diversity, leading to a lack of long-term engagement. Difficulty is inconsistent, with an abrupt curve and clunky controls that can cause frustration, while power-ups may eventually make the game overly easy. Overall, it offers short-lived enjoyment mainly for fans of straightforward retro shooters but is widely regarded as tedious and unimpressive.
- “The core gameplay loop revolves around surviving enemy waves while navigating a confined battlefield from a fixed overhead perspective.”
- “Gameplay starts hard, and avoiding certain attacks may be tricky given the clunky controls, but there are plenty of power ups and the enemy difficulty does not seem to scale up as you progress, so as you power up the game becomes incredibly easy.”
- “This is an extremely basic 2D retro pixel shoot 'em up, with clunky gameplay, zero imaginative game design, and asset-flipped spaceships. It's just shovelware garbage.”
- “Gameplay starts hard, and avoiding certain attacks may be tricky given the clunky controls, but there are plenty of power-ups and the enemies' difficulty does not seem to scale up as you progress, so as you power up the game becomes incredibly easy.”
- “However, the difficulty curve can feel abrupt rather than gradually refined, and without additional gameplay layers to deepen engagement, frustration may replace challenge for some players.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions
The game's graphics feature a modest, retro 2D pixel art style reminiscent of classic shooters, which some find charming while others view as outdated. Visual quality is generally decent but generic, with no options for resolution or graphic customization, limiting the ability to enhance the presentation. Overall, the graphics are adequate but not impressive by modern standards.
- “Visually, the presentation adopts a modest 2D sprite-based aesthetic.”
- “Vertical space shooter with zero story, decent albeit generic graphics and soundtrack.”
- “The graphics looked nice.”
- “A choice was made to use obsolete, decades-old retro pixel art as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
- “There's no option to change the resolution for the game or customize the graphics settings.”
- “There's no way for gamers to try to improve the low quality graphics.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 40% neutral mentions, 60% negative mentions
The game's music is catchy and supports the gameplay with arcade-style, looping background tracks, but it is repetitive and lacks atmosphere. Additionally, the inability to adjust or mute the audio within the game can be frustrating for players.
- “Audio design follows suit, featuring arcade-style sound effects and looping background music that supports the action without adding strong atmosphere.”
- “Vertical space shooter with zero story, decent albeit generic graphics and soundtrack.”
- “Bewilderingly, the game doesn't include proper audio controls, so you can't turn off the annoying background music; you'll need to alt+tab out and stop the music using the Windows sound mixer.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization approach is heavily criticized as a largely unethical cash grab, relying on copied game templates and asset flips with minimal original content. This practice is viewed as shovelware, with allegations of fake reviews and deceptive tactics to profit from low-effort games.
- “These guys do nothing but copy premade game templates and game tutorials, fill out a few things, stamp out basic levels using construction kit templates, slap on an asset-flipped set of sprites/assets, and dump them on Steam and into cheap, nasty shovelware game bundles as cash grabs.”
- “Trying to get paid for someone else's game templates and assets. At best, this is shovelware; at worst, it's a scam/cash grab.”
- “Dmitriy Uvarov/Droid Riot/Indielip have shown a repeated pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab, through this account or closely linked alternate accounts.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The game lacks a structured or engaging story, focusing instead on escalating difficulty without narrative milestones. Overall, the story aspect is minimal to nonexistent, leaving players uninterested.
- “Instead of a structured campaign with story-driven milestones, the game advances through escalating difficulty as enemy numbers and projectile density increase.”
- “Vertical space shooter with zero story, decent albeit generic graphics and soundtrack.”
- “Hardly a success story, gamers just weren't all that interested in the game.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Replayability is primarily driven by players' motivation to achieve higher scores or unlock achievements, rather than experiencing new gameplay mechanics.
- “As a result, replay value depends largely on a player’s interest in chasing higher scores or unlocking achievements rather than exploring new mechanics.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 100% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The atmosphere is functional but lacks depth, with arcade-style sound effects and repetitive background music that complement the gameplay without creating a strong immersive experience.
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Grinding in the game is considered tedious and highly repetitive, lacking challenge and variety.
- “Gameplay is pretty tedious, very repetitive, and not challenging at all.”