Runster

About

Runster is a single player and multiplayer casual sport game. It was developed by Runnex Technology and was released on January 28, 2021. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

No matter what happens outside, keep exercising at home using only a computer and a smartphone. Your workouts won’t be boring ever again with entertaining and interactive gameplay. Have fun and be healthy with Fitforce.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

73%

Audience ScoreBased on 81 reviews

stability4 negative mentions

The game provides a fun and engaging way to exercise, making users sweat and feel active.
Using a smartphone as a motion controller is a novel and affordable concept that appeals to many players.
The game has potential for improvement and can serve as a good alternative to more expensive fitness games.

The game suffers from poor execution, with significant lag and inaccuracies in motion detection, making it frustrating to play.
Many features and exercises are locked behind microtransactions, which can be off-putting for players looking for a complete experience.
The required companion app is often buggy, difficult to connect, and not compatible with older devices, leading to a frustrating user experience.

stability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is inconsistent, with reports of freezing issues, particularly in boss fight mode and during certain exercises, which detracts from the overall experience. While it runs reasonably well on Linux with Proton, users have noted bugs, especially in the phone half and specific exercises, indicating that the game is still in development and requires further refinement.
- “However, keep in mind that this game is still not fully developed; for example, the boss fight mode just freezes and you can't start the game.”
- “The phone half seems a little buggy.”
- “The squat exercise, or maybe the up/down motion, was especially buggy.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
100%
The monetization model of the game is criticized for relying heavily on in-app purchases and microtransactions, which many users feel detracts from the overall experience and creates a constant demand for additional spending. Players express a preference for a one-time purchase option instead.
- “It would be a great game if it weren't based on in-app purchases; I would prefer a one-time payment option instead of constant requests for money.”
- “The presence of microtransactions is a significant aspect of the game.”
- “The game is riddled with microtransactions that feel exploitative.”
- “I can't enjoy the game without being constantly bombarded by ads and in-game purchases.”
- “The monetization strategy ruins the overall experience, making it feel like a cash grab.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story aspect of the game has been criticized, with some users suggesting that it lacks depth and engagement, implying that it may not be worth exploring compared to reading a book.
- “If you want a story, then go read a book.”
- “The plot is predictable and lacks depth.”
- “Character development is minimal, making it hard to care about their journeys.”
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users find the graphics familiar, suggesting that they may not be particularly innovative or groundbreaking.
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is straightforward and lacks complexity, with users indicating that it primarily focuses on the core mechanics without any additional layers or features.