Skip to main content

Fields of Battle

Fields of Battle Game Cover
68%Game Brain Score
gameplay, optimization
graphics, monetization
68% User Score Based on 166 reviews

Platforms

PCTabletPhoneVirtual RealityiPadMobile PlatformiPhoneWindows
Fields of Battle Game Cover

About

Fields of Battle is a single player and multiplayer sport game. It was developed by Super X Studios LLC and was released on April 25, 2013. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

PLAYS GREAT WITH OR WITHOUT VR. The #1 Extreme Sports First-Person Shooter franchise is back. Greg Hastings Paintball presents Fields of Battle! Greg Hastings brings his iconic paintball series to iOS, Android, Kindle, and Steam (PC).

Skip User Reviews

68%
Audience ScoreBased on 166 reviews
gameplay9 positive mentions
graphics12 negative mentions

  • Unique paintball-focused FPS with one-hit eliminations that offer tactical and fast-paced gameplay.
  • Supports cross-platform play including VR, PC, and mobile, providing varied and immersive experiences particularly in VR.
  • Good variety of maps and equipment customization options enhance replayability and personalization.
  • Game has no true multiplayer interaction; players only compete in scores against bots, and official servers have shut down.
  • Heavy reliance on microtransactions, including for essential items like paint and top-tier weapons, leading to pay-to-win concerns.
  • Outdated graphics, frequent bugs, crashes, and clunky controls reduce appeal and immersion, especially on PC and non-VR platforms.
  • graphics
    30 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are widely regarded as outdated and lacking fluidity, with many comparing them to early console or PS2-era visuals. While some acknowledge the game's free-to-play nature and smooth performance, the overall graphical presentation falls short of modern standards, detracting from the game's appeal.

    • “The graphics are state of the art as of 2019.”
    • “Better graphics and loads of memories.”
    • “Graphics nothing to write home about but then again it does look silky smooth in multiplayer, no noticeable lag spikes so far.”
    • “By today's standards these graphics are really just atrocious.”
    • “The graphics are absolutely abysmal.”
    • “The graphics engine and assets were ported from console to mobile and the full mobile game was ported directly to PC with no changes.”
  • gameplay
    25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally praised for being polished, enjoyable, and tactically engaging, with smooth mechanics and a sense of progression. However, some users note dated elements from its mobile origins, challenging one-hit elimination mechanics, and mixed experiences with controls—especially in VR. While not groundbreaking, the gameplay remains the game's strongest and most fun aspect despite drawbacks like graphics and microtransactions.

    • “This mechanic encourages careful movement and deliberate use of cover.”
    • “The mechanics of this game are very polished, everything you do feels nice.”
    • “The transition from mobile origins to PC has left some mechanical elements feeling dated.”
    • “The one-hit elimination mechanic amplifies the difficulty, as even minor mistakes can result in immediate removal from play.”
    • “Really bad movement system for VR players: almost made me throw up in just 15 minutes of gameplay.”
  • monetization
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's monetization heavily relies on mobile-style microtransactions, which many players feel detract from the experience and give it a pay-to-win vibe. While purchases are voluntary and the game is free-to-play, the prevalence of microtransactions is seen as a cash grab and can be annoying, though they are not strictly necessary to progress. Some players note the ease of leveling up without spending, but others criticize the unclear in-game currency system and overall integration of monetization.

    • “Microtransactions are voluntary and considering it's a free-to-play game, I can understand why they were added.”
    • “The microtransactions seem to be disabled in this version from what I am seeing.”
    • “The game is littered with microtransactions but it's so easy to level up and unlock everything in-game they might as well not be there.”
    • “On pricing and value for gamers, this isn't really free as the game is infested with mobile app store-like microtransactions.”
    • “Instead, we have this technically free-to-play game that has some great game mechanics, held back with poor graphics, annoying cash grab micro-transactions, and fields of bots.”
    • “The whole game feels like a dumb smartphone game with a pay-to-win aspect and microtransactions.”
  • grinding
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in the game is frequent but enjoyable, allowing players to unlock all content relatively quickly through consistent effort, though it may require additional resources or time extensions.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “It is possible to unlock everything in a short period of time by just grinding.”
    • “Grindy but fun.”
  • optimization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers excellent optimization, allowing players to customize markers, masks, and gear to suit their preferences while delivering smooth and high-performance gameplay.

    • “Players can modify their markers (paintball guns), masks, and gear to tailor performance to personal preference.”
    • “The game plays awesome and performance is great.”
  • story
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story is minimal or lacking, as the developer relied heavily on multiplayer interactions rather than traditional narrative or level design to engage players.

    • “The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”
  • stability
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from significant stability issues, with frequent bugs affecting gameplay and artificial intelligence performance. Overall, it is considered an unstable and problematic experience.

    • “Incredibly buggy mess.”
    • “It is a little buggy, especially the A.I.”
  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game’s replayability is enhanced by its diverse map variety, offering players fresh experiences with each playthrough.

    • “The map variety contributes to the overall replayability.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Fields of Battle

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Fields of Battle
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Fields of Battle is a sport game.

Fields of Battle is available on PC, Phone, Virtual Reality, iPad and others.

Fields of Battle was released on April 25, 2013.

Fields of Battle was developed by Super X Studios LLC.

Fields of Battle has received mostly positive reviews from players. Most players liked Fields of Battle for its gameplay but disliked it for its graphics.

Fields of Battle is a single player game with multiplayer support.

Similar games include Warface GO: FPS shooting games, Zero Caliber VR, Nine to Five, Modern Combat 5, Onward and others.