FIELD BREAKING

About

"Field Breaking" is a challenging board game where players aim to make the opponent's course collapse, with sophisticated AI that adapts to your play style. The game features up to 8-player online matches, customization options, and realistic physics, making it a great choice for developing strategic thinking. It offers a new era of board game experience for both children and adults.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

38%

Audience ScoreBased on 13 reviews

graphics2 negative mentions

The basic concept of the game is fun and has potential for development.
There is some minor strategy involved in gameplay, which could appeal to hardcore strategic players.
The game is easy to achieve 100% completion, making it suitable for achievement hunters.

The game is abandoned, poorly translated, and has not been updated in years, leading to a lack of player interest.
Graphics and sound design are subpar, with low-quality visuals and annoying sound effects.
The gameplay is shallow and lacks depth, making it boring for casual players.

graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's graphics are characterized by a lazy minimalist style with untextured low-polygon assets, reminiscent of early 1990s 3D games. This approach is criticized as a cover for a lack of effort and talent, rather than a deliberate artistic choice, leading to a disappointing visual experience. Overall, the graphics received a low rating of 1/5.
- “The lack of textures is a method that lazy developers often use to disguise their lack of talent or interest in doing the graphics properly, trying to pass it off as 'art' or 'we made it look bad on purpose.' This is not something gamers should have to put up with.”
- “Music 2/5, graphics 1/5, gameplay 2/5.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story of the game is somewhat obscured by poor machine translation, leading to confusion about gameplay mechanics. Players are tasked with destroying hexagons to ultimately cause a statue to fall, but the narrative context may be lost on some due to the translation issues.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music received a low rating of 2/5, indicating that it may not have made a significant positive impact on the overall gaming experience.
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I found the soundtrack to be uninspired and forgettable, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
- “The audio quality is poor, and the music feels out of place with the game's atmosphere.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The gameplay received a low rating of 2/5, indicating that players found it lacking in engagement and enjoyment. Overall, the gameplay experience does not meet expectations, especially when compared to other aspects of the game.
- “The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I found the controls to be unresponsive, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
- “The mechanics are clunky and often lead to frustrating moments during play.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game demonstrates a commendable approach to early access, initially launching with significant bugs but quickly addressing most issues within two days. The developers are responsive to player feedback, enhancing overall stability.
- “This game is clearly a prime example of an early access title done wrong; it released in a buggy, nigh on unplayable state.”
- “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly impossible to enjoy any gameplay.”
- “I encountered numerous bugs that completely broke my experience, and the stability issues are frustrating.”