FIELD BREAKING

About

FIELD BREAKING is a single player and multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by Evoluta Studio and was released on June 3, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Field Breaking" is a challenging board game where players aim to make the opponent's course collapse, with sophisticated AI that adapts to your play style. The game features up to 8-player online matches, customization options, and realistic physics, making it a great choice for developing strategic thinking. It offers a new era of board game experience for both children and adults.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

41%

Audience ScoreBased on 17 reviews

graphics2 negative mentions

The basic concept of the game is fun and has potential for development.
Achievement hunters may find value in the game as it is easy to complete all achievements.
The game offers a simple and quick experience, making it accessible for casual players.

The game is abandoned, poorly translated, and lacks updates, leading to a subpar experience.
Graphics and sound design are low quality, making the game visually and audibly unappealing.
The gameplay is shallow and lacks depth, with no multiplayer options available, resulting in a boring experience.

graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's graphics are criticized for their lazy minimalist style, featuring untextured low-polygon assets that evoke a poorly executed 3D aesthetic reminiscent of early 1990s games. This approach is perceived as a cover for a lack of artistic effort, leading to a disappointing visual experience. Overall, the graphics received a low rating of 1/5.
- “The lack of textures is a method that lazy developers often use to disguise their lack of talent or interest in doing the graphics properly, trying to pass it off as 'art' or 'we made it look bad on purpose.' This is not something gamers should have to put up with.”
- “Music 2/5, graphics 1/5, gameplay 2/5.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The story of the game is somewhat obscured by poor machine translation, leading to confusion about gameplay mechanics. Players are tasked with destroying hexagons to ultimately cause a statue to fall, but the narrative context is not clearly conveyed.
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The music in the game received a low rating of 2 out of 5, indicating that it may not be engaging or memorable, contributing to an overall lackluster experience alongside the graphics and gameplay.
- “The music is repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I found the soundtrack to be uninspired and forgettable, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
- “The audio quality of the music is poor, and it feels like an afterthought in the game's design.”
gameplay
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The gameplay received a low rating of 2/5, indicating that players found it lacking in engagement and enjoyment. Overall, the gameplay experience does not meet expectations, especially when compared to other aspects of the game.
- “The gameplay feels repetitive and lacks depth, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I found the controls to be unresponsive, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
- “The mechanics are poorly designed, leading to frustrating moments that ruin the flow of the game.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game demonstrates strong stability for an early access title, with developers quickly addressing and fixing most initial bugs within two days of release, while also being receptive to player feedback.
- “This game is clearly a prime example of an early access title done wrong; it released in a buggy, nigh on unplayable state.”
- “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly impossible to enjoy the experience.”
- “I encountered numerous bugs that severely impacted gameplay, leading to a frustrating experience.”