Eradicator

About

Eradicator is a single player action game. It was developed by Accolade, Inc and was released on November 6, 2014. It received positive reviews from players.

"Eradicator" is a fast-paced action game set on an alien planet, where you must infiltrate and destroy a reactivated fortress to save humanity. As one of three characters, armed with over 20 weapons, navigate through 25 puzzle-filled levels and defeat hordes of enemies. The game offers a picture-in-picture view and network play for up to 8 players, enhancing the gameplay experience.

Genres & Tags

Action

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

85%

Audience ScoreBased on 48 reviews

gameplay5 positive mentions

replayability3 negative mentions

Eradicator features a vast selection of weapons and unique character abilities, enhancing gameplay variety and replayability.
The game offers a nostalgic experience with fluid movement, satisfying gunplay, and interesting puzzles that keep players engaged.
The ability to switch between first-person and third-person perspectives, along with the level editor, adds depth and customization to the gameplay.

The level design can be confusing and repetitive, often leading to frustration in navigation and finding objectives.
The low resolution and outdated graphics may cause discomfort for some players, detracting from the overall experience.
There is a lack of a level selection feature and some technical issues, such as characters getting stuck in walls, which can hinder gameplay.

gameplay
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
43%
21%
The gameplay is reminiscent of classic 90s first-person shooters, featuring straightforward objectives like defeating enemies and completing tasks to progress. While it offers a diverse array of weapons and fast-paced action, some players find the platforming elements clumsy and the graphics dated. Overall, it appeals to retro FPS fans with its functional mechanics and unique level designs, despite some criticisms regarding its execution and lack of personality compared to contemporaries.
- “The gameplay consists of the usual 90's FPS fun, but makes itself unique by the vast selection of weapons to use and the large percentage of flying enemies, which gives the game a fast and jumpy feel.”
- “As a mostly forgotten 90s-era FPS, Eradicator holds up pretty well gameplay-wise even today.”
- “Once the controls are properly set, it's smooth and fast. The platforming elements feel a bit messy, but aside from that, it really has solid and addictive gameplay on par with modern standards.”
- “The gameplay doesn't really hold up that well, and the low resolution hurts your eyeballs, but I really like the aesthetic in these old games.”
- “Sometimes the gameplay attempts to vary itself with sections where you remotely control a robot (tedious) or do something with a time limit (egregious).”
- “On a gameplay level, this one feels like it just came out, seriously, and it predates several years of excellent old school FPS like Exhumed; this one really has clumsy gameplay in comparison.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The graphics of the game evoke a nostalgic aesthetic reminiscent of 90s titles, featuring gritty futuristic visuals and pre-rendered sprites, though they may cause motion sickness and are considered low resolution by modern standards. While some players appreciate the unique atmosphere and level designs, others find the graphics uninspired compared to contemporary competitors like Duke 3D and Quake. Overall, the visuals are seen as a mixed bag, appealing to fans of retro gaming but lacking the polish of more recent releases.
- “It really pushes that gritty futuristic feel as well as the sheen that comes with pre-rendered graphics sprites.”
- “The graphics are also really good for their time and give the game a gritty and dirty sci-fi atmosphere I enjoy a lot.”
- “Maybe it’s because I’ve been with this game since I was a kid, the graphics still seem okay to me.”
- “When it came out, it was up against some serious competition with Duke 3D and the graphical powerhouse that was Quake.”
- “Its aesthetically nostalgic, but can cause some motion sickness.”
- “Graphically, it cannot hold a candle to that game.”
story
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The story is generally viewed as clichéd and reminiscent of a low-budget sci-fi film, lacking depth and character development, which diminishes player investment. While the game features a plot and mission objectives that provide some structure, many reviewers feel it could benefit from a more engaging narrative and character attributes. Despite its shortcomings, the game offers a variety of gameplay mechanics that add interest beyond the basic story.
- “I do like the objective completion system in place of traditional key hunting; it adds a little more variety and interest to the story than it would otherwise.”
- “I would recommend they do something more with the story and characters to give both more depth, and obviously remake with a modern engine, but the skeleton is definitely here for a great game series.”
- “A good game, some classic FPS platforming, puzzles, and shooting :) It actually has a plot and mission objectives which help you get into the character you select to play as.”
- “The story was very cliché.”
- “The story itself is typical b-grade sci-fi flick kind of stuff, which could have been forgiven if the characters had attributes that made you more invested in the story.”
- “As many games of that period, the story is slightly bland and generic, but still explains what, where, and why you are doing.”
music
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players criticizing the limited variety and lack of volume control for the CD-ROM soundtrack. While the main menu music is noted as a highlight, many feel that the ambient soundtrack effectively enhances the game's atmosphere, contributing to a sense of tension despite its background presence. Overall, the audio design is appreciated for its immersive quality, though it may not stand out significantly during gameplay.
- “The horror element comes from the perpetually dim environments and the haunting ambient soundtrack, which suggests trepidation on the part of the player rather than going in guns-blazing (though you are free to play that way if you so desire).”
- “Hi-res environmental audio with really artistic soundtracks.”
- “Immersive music, enemy noises, gib sounds-- very impressive for its time.”
- “Some people have complained that there is only one music track throughout the whole game.”
- “The biggest letdown for me was the levels and the soundtrack.”
- “The music also doesn't really do much and stays in the background most of the time, adding to the ambience of the game.”
atmosphere
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The atmosphere of the game is characterized by its atmospheric level design and gritty sci-fi visuals, which some players find enjoyable despite feeling uninspired compared to more renowned titles. While the game offers a brief and fun adventure in an alien world, it struggles to match the immersive qualities of competitors like Duke, which is noted for its superior atmosphere and interactivity. Overall, the graphics are appreciated for their time, but opinions vary on their effectiveness in creating a compelling atmosphere.
- “While the enjoyability of Eradicator is hampered at some points during the game, it's mostly a brief yet fun adventure into an atmospheric and alien world.”
- “The graphics are also really good for their time and give the game a gritty and dirty sci-fi atmosphere I enjoy a lot.”
- “- Atmospheric level design and art.”
- “The graphics and atmosphere feel uninspired compared to most famous titles.”
- “Duke has the atmosphere; this game lacks that depth.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The game offers significant replayability due to the presence of multiple characters, each with unique stats and weapons that allow for different gameplay experiences and shortcuts. Players can explore various strategies and paths, enhancing the overall replay value.
- “The game is highly replayable due to different characters (one is hidden!) who can take shortcuts or approach challenges in slightly different ways because of their unique stats and varying weapons.”
- “The game is more or less replayable due to different characters (one is hidden!) who can somehow make shortcuts or can take slightly different paths because of their different stats and slightly varying weapons.”
- “There is a lot of replay value to be found, as there are multiple different characters to choose from.”
- “It's pretty neat and adds to the replayability.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the grinding aspects of the game tedious, particularly during sections that involve remotely controlling a robot or completing tasks under time constraints, which are often viewed as frustrating rather than engaging.
- “The grinding feels endless and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
- “I found myself doing the same tasks over and over again, which quickly became tedious and frustrating.”
- “The game tries to mix things up, but the grinding ultimately overshadows any attempts at variety.”
stability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game demonstrates fairly good physics for its age and is noted for having no significant glitches, contributing to a stable overall experience.
- “The physics are fairly good for a dated title, and I haven't encountered any glitches.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any major issues, providing a stable experience.”
- “I've experienced consistent performance throughout my playtime, which enhances the overall enjoyment.”