Skip to main content

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle Game Cover
83%Game Brain Score
graphics, gameplay
monetization, stability
83% User Score Based on 1,140 reviews

Platforms

TabletAndroidPhoneMobile Platform
Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle Game Cover

About

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle is a single player casual puzzle game. It received positive reviews from players.

Pure Logic: single player Einstein Riddles, or live competition

Skip User Reviews

83%
Audience ScoreBased on 1,140 reviews
graphics16 positive mentions
monetization336 negative mentions

  • Challenging logic puzzles with multiple difficulty levels suitable for all skill levels.
  • Large number of puzzles ensuring extended playtime without repetition fatigue.
  • Minimal and non-intrusive ads, with option to pay for ad-free experience.
  • User-friendly interface with helpful features like clue filters, save checkpoints, and undo functionality.
  • Pictogram clues aid comprehension and make puzzles accessible for all ages.
  • Offline mode and cross-device sync add to convenience and usability.
  • Higher difficulty levels sometimes require guesswork due to insufficient or contradictory clues, detracting from pure logic.
  • Icons and interface elements can be too small on phone screens, making gameplay difficult, especially on hardest levels.
  • Frequent and sometimes intrusive ads distract during gameplay, with complaints about changes from ad-free to subscription model.
  • Newer UI updates viewed as cluttered or visually unappealing by some users.
  • Lack of variety in clue categories and repeated use of same objects can cause visual and mental fatigue.
  • Lack of hint system or effective mid-puzzle solution checking frustrates some players when stuck.
  • monetization
    378 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Monetization primarily relies on occasional, short, and mostly non-intrusive ads, with many users appreciating the minimal ad frequency and the option to remove ads via a one-time payment or subscription. However, frustrations arise from the recent increase in ad frequency, intrusive ads during gameplay, loud or unskippable ads, ads interfering with UI elements, and the shift from a one-time purchase ad removal to a subscription model, causing dissatisfaction among those who previously paid for ad-free versions. Overall, while the ads are tolerable for many, aggressive and poorly placed ads diminish the enjoyment for some players.

    • “There are no ads whatsoever (assuming I haven't forgotten that I paid for ad-free, but if I did, it was worth it.)”
    • “Loved it enough to pay for the game in full with no ads.”
    • “I paid for no ads and it makes the gameplay so much more pleasant.”
    • “The ads make this app practically unusable.”
    • “I paid for the ad-free version years ago and now I have ads.”
    • “Unskippable ads ambush you at any given moment and it's not spaced out at all—they're basically back to back and not only that but you can't finish your daily challenges anymore unless you agree to watch an ad.”
  • graphics
    63 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics are simple, clear, and functional, prioritizing gameplay over visual complexity with a generally cute and intuitive design. However, many users find the graphics small and low-resolution, especially on smaller screens and higher difficulty levels, and some desire more variety and improved aesthetics. Overall, the basic graphics are well-suited for the puzzle focus but could benefit from enhancements to reduce monotony and improve visibility.

    • “You have so many "levels," such a great range in difficulty, and the graphics are super clear and adorable!”
    • “I love the visuals: cute and easy to differentiate.”
    • “The color coding makes this sort of game a lot easier to play for my dysgraphic brain.”
    • “The main negative is that the graphics get really tiny with the bigger grids.”
    • “Cons: graphics way too small for phones, especially in the advanced levels.”
    • “Disadvantages are low resolution graphics, minute amount of objects to own, be, etc. very repetitive.”
  • gameplay
    31 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is praised for its intuitive, clean mechanics and engaging logic puzzles that balance challenge and solvability, with features like helpful filters and highlighted squares enhancing the experience. While the core gameplay remains addictive and well-designed, many users find frequent ads intrusive and disruptive, detracting significantly from enjoyment unless removed via purchase. Overall, the game offers straightforward yet stimulating gameplay suitable for both newcomers and enthusiasts, though some desire more variety in graphics and hints.

    • “New features are still being added, and the original logic puzzle gameplay is still excellent.”
    • “It distills the logic puzzle down to the core gameplay, almost like a cross between sudoku and the traditional logic puzzle.”
    • “The interface and gameplay is intuitive and clean, never had any buggy issues, and the only thing I could even think to improve would be all aesthetic.”
    • “Horrible gameplay due to ads.”
    • “Gameplay is also quite difficult on the bigger grids as everything is so small and obscured.”
    • “I'd be okay with ads in between each level seeing as the harder ones take upwards of 20 minutes, but don't interrupt gameplay for ads!”
  • stability
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game generally offers stable performance with minimal glitches or bugs, contributing to a smooth and enjoyable experience for most users. However, some players report intermittent freezing and lag issues, particularly during level changes or after extended play, which can disrupt gameplay and cause frustrations. Overall, stability is strong but could benefit from improvements to address occasional bugs and freezes.

    • “Excellent quality and no glitches.”
    • “No glitches in over 500 games, and I only skipped one game as I couldn't figure out the solution.”
    • “No ads & no glitches or errors!”
    • “It worked well for about two days, but has continuously had lag and glitches since.”
    • “While playing or changing levels, it freezes for 5 to 15 seconds at a time, even the clock.”
    • “After every time one plays the game freezes and you have to reopen the game and you lose your ability to undo your past moves.”
  • story
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect is generally viewed as lacking or nonexistent, with users noting the absence of narrative or thematic elements to engage them beyond the puzzles. Many express a desire for more story-driven content or varied scenarios, but still appreciate the game's consistent gameplay and challenge levels. Overall, while the lack of a story is seen as a drawback, it does not detract from the enjoyment of the puzzles themselves.

    • “While I enjoy story puzzles more with worded clues and X's and O's, this is the best free logic game!”
    • “It works; the developers don't 'mess about' with it (constantly changing it, making quests, or other nonsense). The levels range from very easy to ridiculously hard for when you want a proper challenge!”
    • “The categories are bizarre and I wish there was more of a story, but the categories make me laugh (everyone knows the common household pets are dog, rabbit, cat, and elephant), and the game always works well and is fun to play.”
    • “There is no interesting story, and the puzzles are similar in nature because the categories are recycled.”
    • “My only complaint is the repetitive content and lack of a story or puzzle theme to make things more interesting.”
    • “It would be nice if there was some story to the scenarios instead of being entirely random.”
  • grinding
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Grinding in this game is marked by tedious and repetitive trial-and-error, with users frustrated by the lack of clear, easily accessible clues that force blind guessing instead of logical deduction. The manual process of testing each item is seen as boring and unskillful, detracting from the puzzle experience.

    • “Instead of finding out how many green and red hints each item has by selecting and unselecting them one by one (which is a tedious task), two numbers should be written next to each item, one to indicate the green hints and one to indicate the red hints, small numbers in circles each colored with the same hint they refer to.”
    • “Unlike minesweeper where you just pick one and go, this game quickly becomes a messy and tedious trial and error experience. If they made sure there were enough clues so that there was no guessing, it would easily get 5 stars. But as it is, it's just annoying; I want to play a logic game to use logic, not to blindly guess.”
    • “This is rather tedious as sometimes one gets it first time due to luck, but then one can also spend time testing each incorrect guess - which is just boring and not skillful.”
  • music
    5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users appreciate the game's variety of music themes and the option to play while listening to other audio, but they are frustrated by loud, intrusive ad music that disrupts gameplay in quiet settings.

    • “I can play while listening to audio input (books on tape or listening to music), which is great.”
    • “It has vehicles, drinks, flags, musical instruments, sports, etc., for every game.”
    • “The ads used to be quiet, and I'm fine with ads, but one cannot have the ads just blast loud music in conditions where one might be playing, like in bed or in a quiet house.”
    • “I'll be in the middle of a puzzle and boom - obnoxious music with an ad I can't click off of (though switching to the home screen and back to the app takes me back to the puzzle without the ad).”
    • “Maybe some relaxing music.”
  • optimization
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Users report smooth performance with no optimization issues, indicating the game runs efficiently on their systems.

  • replayability
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game offers exceptionally high replayability due to its thousands of unique puzzles, each providing varied experiences with different starting points.

    • “All of the puzzles (like, thousands of puzzles) are unique, and they're replayable with different starting points.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle

Skip Games Like Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle is a casual puzzle game.

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle was developed by Rottz Games.

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle has received positive reviews from players. Most players liked Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle for its graphics but disliked it for its monetization.

Einstein's Riddle Logic Puzzle is a single player game.

Similar games include GridSwan (Nonogram Puzzles), Sudoku: Number Match Game, Sudoku Offline - Brain Game, Flow Free, Nonograms CrossMe and others.