eFootball™ CHAMPION SQUADS

About

"eFootball™ CHAMPION SQUADS is a soccer game known for its good mechanics and compelling graphics, providing a fun and immersive experience. Use the best players and tactics to defeat world-class opponents and enjoy hilarious moments on the pitch. Take your skills to the online pitch and compete against other players to become a champion squad."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

85%

Audience ScoreBased on 15,676 reviews

graphics197 positive mentions

monetization8 negative mentions

graphics
286 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
69%
26%
5%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the overall visual quality and design, while others criticize them as outdated or in need of improvement. Some users rate the graphics as decent or good, but express a desire for enhancements to achieve a more realistic experience. Overall, while the graphics are often described as enjoyable, there is a consensus that they require further development to meet player expectations.
- “The graphics and physics are excellent.”
- “Absolutely love the game has great graphics while watching matches and great ways of getting players with draws keep up the work konami!”
- “Amazing graphics amazing card designs.”
- “The game is a total flop even though the graphics are world-class, but there are a lot of problems with it, especially with my league. The controls are bogus, and they keep manipulating the opponent players. They score from an offside position, but from the same position, your players are flagged offside.”
- “Was like 1956 graphics and it's not real at all. Cheat everywhere, players can't even run or stretch for the ball. My opponent beats me 11:0 because the cartoon can't go for the ball. Just upgrade this game to the newest version of 2023 graphics.”
- “Unbelievably low graphics.”
gameplay
59 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
34%
46%
20%
The gameplay of the game receives mixed reviews, with some praising its graphics and smooth mechanics, while others criticize the lack of control, outdated animations, and unbalanced matchmaking. Many users express frustration over AI-driven gameplay and the inability to make tactical changes during matches, leading to a repetitive and sometimes boring experience. Overall, while there are elements of enjoyment, significant improvements are needed to enhance realism and player engagement.
- “Great graphics, excellent gameplay, op cards”
- “I love the gameplay and graphics, also I love the commentary because it sounds so funny and the commentary is riveting”
- “It's beautiful gameplay”
- “Who is playing this boring, poorly developed, never updated, year 2000 graphics, no gameplay, same goal over and over again, worst sports game ever?”
- “After playing this game for a year, the cons are: first of all, the goalkeepers are practically useless. I've played over 10,000 games and I've seen 20 saves by my goalkeeper. They should replace the goalkeeper with an extra player at least. You can't change the tactics in-game or make a substitution, even if you get a red card. You are forced to watch a full game in PvP. At least provide an option to fast forward for both players. I haven't seen Bale activate a skill ever; the gameplay becomes boring and requires lots of time.”
- “Joke of a game... ridiculous gameplay with 0 realism. Players dribbling past players like they're invisible.”
humor
22 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is generally well-received, with many players finding it genuinely funny and enjoying the comedic elements, particularly the commentary. However, some users feel that the execution of humor could be improved, as it sometimes feels inconsistent with the gameplay experience. Overall, the game is described as entertaining and humorous, contributing positively to the overall enjoyment.
- “I love the gameplay and graphics, also I love the commentary because it sounds so funny and the commentary is riveting.”
- “This game is really humorous... I enjoyed it very much.”
- “I think this is a really funny game and I love the power of the players.”
monetization
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
7%
57%
The monetization aspect of the game receives mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the lack of intrusive ads and the availability of free content, while others criticize the excessive ads and perceived unfairness of in-app purchases. Many users express frustration over the game's monetization strategies, labeling them as cash grabs and highlighting the negative impact of ads on gameplay. Overall, the experience varies significantly, with some enjoying a more ad-free experience and others feeling overwhelmed by advertisements and costly purchases.
- “Amazing game, no ads, great players for free!”
- “No ads”
- “No ads”
- “This app is the worst game ever. It looks like they made it out of trash; there are so many ads and I can't even delete it. I won't recommend this game to anyone, waste of data.”
- “The in-game purchase is a rip-off, as the odds are heavily against you.”
- “Game is full of ads that irritate.”
music
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
80%
20%
The music in the game is often described as annoying and reminiscent of arcade sounds, contributing to an overall low-quality experience. Additionally, there seems to be a repetitive focus on the lyrics of "The Blood of the Lamb," which may detract from the enjoyment for some players.
- “It's like an arcade game, annoying sounds, music, even the graphics are low!”
story
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
20%
60%
The story aspect of the game is perceived as frustrating, with players expressing dissatisfaction over mission completion issues and the impact of maintenance on gameplay. While some enjoy the narrative, they feel that the duration of events is too short to fully engage with the missions. Overall, the story is seen as a mixed experience, hindered by technical problems and time constraints.
- “Good game, I think the events should be longer instead of 7-10 days since it's not easy to complete all the missions.”
- “I had a match to complete the mission and it went into maintenance... it ruined my experience.”
- “I finished my beginner mission, but I didn't receive the 100+ player draw completion reward.”
- “Good game, but I think the events should be longer instead of 7-10 days since it's not easy to complete all the missions.”
grinding
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, citing rampant cheating through auto-farming tools and an overly complicated system that feels exploitative. While the game has enjoyable elements, the heavy grinding required is seen as a significant drawback.
- “Rampant cheating by using auto-farming tools is going on.”
- “Overcomplicated, messy drivel; it's not a farming simulator in the sense that it's designed so you become a cash cow.”
- “Good game with enjoyable aspects, but two fatal flaws: heavy grinding and...”
emotional
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players express a strong emotional connection to the game, highlighting its outstanding quality and the nostalgic feelings it evokes. However, some users note specific frustrations, such as gameplay mechanics that detract from their overall experience. Overall, the game successfully elicits a range of emotions, from joy to nostalgia.
- “Best game ever made me feel like I am going back to work tomorrow”
- “Emotional standard”
- “Emotional standard”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
150%
Ultimate Draft Soccer is praised for its high replayability, offering a fun and engaging experience that encourages players to customize matches for added enjoyment. Users appreciate the game's design, which enhances its playability and keeps them coming back for more.
- “Ultimate Draft Soccer is a much better and infinitely more playable and fun implementation of what this game tried to be.”
- “Very good game! I loved it very much. I liked the way of drawing matches; I'm rating it 4 because you can make the matches more playable by ourselves.”
- “The game lacks variety, making it hard to find reasons to replay it after finishing.”
- “Once you've completed the main story, there's little incentive to dive back in.”
- “The limited choices and outcomes mean that replaying feels more like a chore than an adventure.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players appreciate the game but are experiencing lagging performance, indicating a need for optimization updates to enhance gameplay.