Duck Life 4

About

Duck Life 4 is a single player casual racing game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Raise your duckling into a champion racer in this addictive pet & adventure game

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 9,982 reviews

graphics50 positive mentions

monetization76 negative mentions

monetization
111 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
19%
13%
68%
The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism from users, who express a strong preference for ads over the current paywall that blocks access to the latter half of the game. Many players feel that requiring in-app purchases to continue playing is a cash grab, arguing that the game should either be fully free with ads or allow for optional purchases for cosmetic items instead. Overall, the consensus is that the abrupt paywall detracts from the enjoyment of the game, and a more ad-based model would be more acceptable.
- “I love how there's no ads, but it would make money and you wouldn't have to pay for future worlds as well if you max every duck and complete the game. You basically have nothing to do but just reset the game.”
- “There are no ads, which isn't very common in most games today, and the creators aren't money hungry.”
- “I understand that companies need to make money, and I am grateful that there are no ads, but perhaps you could change it so you can finish all the levels for free, but some items like costumes and eggs cost real money.”
- “It's not that a dollar is a lot, but the fact that it comes out of literally nowhere (no other in-game purchases that I could see) halfway through the game felt flat out disrespectful.”
- “Charging to continue to play in the middle of the game is shameless monetization by soulless money-hungry developers.”
- “I understand that the developers need a profit, but they should just use advertising to increase the energy level of your duck or a similar mechanic.”
graphics
81 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
62%
31%
7%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising the cute art style and improved visuals compared to previous versions. However, some users criticize the graphics for being inconsistent or not meeting their expectations, particularly in terms of resolution and animation quality. Overall, while the graphics are generally appreciated, there are calls for further enhancements and updates.
- “The graphics are exceptional and it recreates the computer version very well.”
- “First of all the graphics are stunning and the game really gives you that caring feeling.”
- “Great graphics, very nostalgic.”
- “I was willing to ignore that 1/4th of the time when I touched the screen it didn't sense it, and that it had bad graphics, but now I can't even finish the game.”
- “The combination of ultra low-resolution, choppy animations, an art style that looks like it is just a bunch of photos from Microsoft Clip Art, and badly made gameplay make this version of the 'Duck Life' franchise worse than the original flash version.”
- “Graphics and interface are worse and you must pay for half of the game.”
music
61 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
36%
53%
11%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its charm and cuteness, while others find it annoying and a significant downgrade from the original soundtrack. Many users express a desire for the return of the classic music from previous versions, citing that the new tracks feel out of place or overly childish. Overall, while some enjoy the new compositions, a substantial number of players are dissatisfied and believe the music detracts from the overall experience.
- “Adorable game, awesome music 11/10”
- “Love the music, very calming, good game.”
- “I just love the charm in the music!”
- “Game is decent but the music is absolutely horrible, I can't bear to listen to it any longer.”
- “The music is terrible, change it to Duck Life 4 on the PC please. I also hate the way you pay for the mountain and the others from that point onward.”
- “I would have rated it five stars but the music... god it's terrible, good game though.”
stability
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with numerous users reporting persistent glitches, freezing issues, and control problems that hinder gameplay, particularly during training and tournaments. While some players have experienced smooth performance, the overall consensus highlights a need for significant bug fixes to enhance the gaming experience. Additionally, the introduction of a paywall has drawn mixed reactions, further complicating user satisfaction.
- “I also can't play in the tournaments anymore because it freezes and won't allow me to choose my racers.”
- “It's good but when you climb then climb again it glitches so I can't get past the tournament.”
- “Fun and kid-friendly, however, it glitches out at certain stages making it impossible to advance.”
gameplay
41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
44%
46%
10%
The gameplay of the game is generally described as fun and engaging, with appealing mechanics and graphics; however, many users express frustration over a paywall that restricts access to additional content, leading to a sense of disappointment and limiting the overall experience. While some players enjoy the grinding aspect and find the gameplay enjoyable, others criticize it for being repetitive and plagued by glitches, with controls that can be challenging on mobile devices. Overall, the gameplay is seen as a mixed bag, with potential overshadowed by monetization issues and technical problems.
- “The gameplay is fun and hasn't gotten boring.”
- “Incredible gameplay and much more.”
- “Excellent gameplay.”
- “The game was fun at first, training and competing, but after I finished the 3rd area, my gameplay was cut short because I need to pay for the next area. It was good but so disappointing because I can't buy the next area, so this game is trash.”
- “There's maybe an hour of gameplay before the sneaky paywall.”
- “Boring gameplay and shameless money grabbing.”
humor
39 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely appreciated, with players finding the quirky characters, particularly the ducks, to be both cute and hilarious. Many reviews highlight the game's amusing elements, such as the absurdity of its mechanics and the playful tone, making it an enjoyable and entertaining experience. Overall, the humor adds a lighthearted charm that enhances the gameplay, despite some critiques about monetization.
- “The fact that Cool Math Games can do things better than the actual company it belongs to is kind of funny.”
- “It's funny because it's a duck!”
- “The game is really cute and funny!”
story
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
64%
12%
The story aspect of the game is generally well-received for its charm and engaging narrative, but many players express frustration over the requirement to pay to access the latter half of the story. Users feel that the game is too short and would benefit from additional missions, and while the initial gameplay is enjoyable, the paywall significantly detracts from the overall experience.
- “Cute minigames and it is an adorable story.”
- “I am no connoisseur in phone gaming but this game is excellent... runs smooth, oddly fun, and intriguing... it captures the sense of how phone games should be more mini games with a greater plot at hand but in a simplistic way!”
- “I love the way the story goes; it's a great game.”
- “But the fact I have to pay to advance the story and just the game in general, even if it's half a dollar, is pretty messed up.”
- “Rip the 4 hours I spent playing to only get to the 4th area where you have to pay for it and can't complete the story.”
- “I like the game but I would like to play the whole story without paying.”
grinding
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding aspect of the game to be both engaging and tedious, with many enjoying the process of leveling up their characters. However, a significant frustration arises from the abrupt paywall that halts progress after extensive grinding, leading to feelings of wasted time and dissatisfaction. Overall, while the grinding can be fun, it is marred by the monetization strategy that many players feel is unfair.
- “Game's good, no ads but I put it at 1 star because of that paywall. I wasted an hour of my time grinding through the levels and I got hit by the paywall like I'm a kid and I can't afford to buy the next levels. Please remove the paywall.”
- “I was doing my regular grinding that I used to think was fun until it said I have to pay to go on, and that was very stupid.”
- “I was grinding my character a bunch to where I had level 150 in running, swimming, and flying, and I spent well over a couple of hours just to find out I have to pay.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
67%
Users express disappointment in the replayability of the game, describing it as lacking variation and comparing it unfavorably to watching a monotonous event. Many feel that the cost does not justify the limited replay value, with some suggesting that a lower price point might make it more acceptable. Overall, the consensus is that the game offers minimal incentive for repeated play.
- “The replay value of these games is incredibly high, offering new experiences with each playthrough.”
- “The game is highly replayable, with different choices leading to unique outcomes.”
- “Each playthrough feels fresh and engaging, making you want to dive back in for more.”
- “Maybe if the full first game was free, and then the next 3 games in the series were behind a $1 paywall, then I would be fine with it, but I wouldn't be willing to pay more than that since the replay value of these games is no more than watching ducks win a race with no variation.”
- “2$ for a crappy, slow, glitchy, non-replayable game?”
optimization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The game's optimization appears to be limited primarily to 16:9 aspect ratios, with some users reporting smooth performance and no glitches, while others criticize the controls and overall optimization as poor.
- “Personally, I haven't had any glitches, and this game runs smoothly.”
- “It seems like this game is only optimized for a screen with a 16:9 aspect ratio.”
- “Poorly optimized with bad controls.”