Skip to main content

Demolish & Build 2017

If you enjoy tedious, limited 3D puzzle games masquerading as a simulation, this is the game for you. If you're anyone else on earth, just get a job working in actual construction and get paid.
71%Game Brain Score
gameplay, graphics
story, grinding
79% User Score Based on 342 reviews
Critic Score 45%Based on 2 reviews

Platforms

PCPCWindowsWindows

About

Demolish & Build 2017 is a sandbox simulation game where you run a demolition and construction company. Destroy buildings, manage workers, and invest profits in land properties to rent out. Use various machines, such as tower cranes, bulldozers, skid loaders, and excavators, to complete tasks. Experience advanced destruction physics and customize machine parts for specialized jobs.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
Demolish & Build 2017 screenshot
+10

79%
Audience ScoreBased on 342 reviews
gameplay6 positive mentions
grinding15 negative mentions

  • The game offers a fun and satisfying experience with the ability to demolish and build, providing a unique gameplay loop.
  • It runs smoothly without crashes, and the graphics are decent for its time, making it visually appealing.
  • The game is relaxing and can be enjoyed casually, making it a good time killer for players looking to unwind.
  • The physics engine is poorly implemented, leading to frustrating and unrealistic interactions with the environment.
  • Gameplay becomes repetitive quickly, with limited content and no real incentive to continue after completing the main missions.
  • Controls can be clunky and unintuitive, particularly when driving vehicles, which detracts from the overall experience.
  • gameplay
    62 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is characterized by a mix of arcade-style mechanics that, while smooth and engaging, often lack depth and realism, leading to a somewhat unsatisfying experience for players seeking immersion. Users appreciate the variety of machines and the freedom to choose activities, but many criticize the presence of invisible walls, loading screens, and a cluttered user interface, which detract from the overall enjoyment. Despite some intriguing tools and decent mechanics, the game is seen as incomplete and less polished compared to other simulation titles.

    • “There are quite a lot of different machines to play with, introduced one at a time, and I like that the gameplay gives you the freedom to decide what you want to do next.”
    • “I bought it today and I was shocked because it has cool gameplay and graphics.”
    • “It has arcade style gameplay that will hook you immediately, but it isn't that deep.”
    • “The mechanics are tough.”
    • “Some of the tools and instruments are intriguing; however, I found that the actual gameplay associated with them to be generally disappointing and simplistic.”
    • “Here are some things that hinder the gameplay: invisible walls, driving up hills, and too many loading screens.”
  • story
    52 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is minimal and revolves around building a demolition company, with players completing basic missions to earn money and upgrade tools. Reviewers note that the narrative lacks depth and entertainment value, with a short campaign lasting only 7-8 hours and little incentive to continue playing afterward. Overall, the experience is described as tedious, with repetitive missions and a lack of engaging content or continuity.

    • “There's not much grind as long as you follow the story.”
    • “You can feel that you're progressing as more and more vehicles, mission types, and options become available to you, and you can feel that the developers actually cared and wanted to make it interesting to play.”
    • “I just completed the main story, which is all about building all kinds of structures; you will earn money to build by demolishing older structures through contracts.”
    • “There's no menu but a load profile button, there's no proper introduction to the game, there are no people around you, just a few low-quality cars driving around with an awkward AI, no story, no continuity, no secondary missions, just nothing.”
    • “I completed the story in about 7-8 hours, it's way too short for a story and way too incomplete to give so little chance to play it further like a tycoon or sandbox game.”
    • “The story is very basic and easy to follow, although it does not make for an entertaining experience.”
  • graphics
    48 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in the game have received mixed reviews, with many noting a significant improvement in the sequel compared to the first installment, although some players still experience frame rate issues. While some users find the visuals decent and enjoyable, others criticize them as outdated and lacking detail, especially for a game released in 2016. Overall, the graphics are considered satisfactory for the gameplay, but optimization and detail enhancements could elevate the experience further.

    • “Graphics are actually better than I thought they'd be, and there's a lot to be said for just smashing things up!”
    • “I bought it today and I was shocked because it has cool gameplay and graphics.”
    • “Have not played it much, but excellent graphics and gameplay.”
    • “I have a GTX 1060 6GB and locked on to 40-50fps in high settings... the graphics are so poor, yet somehow the framerate is bad?”
    • “Frankly, the graphics suck for a game released in 2016, especially for the load this game puts on my graphics card.”
    • “Despite its clumsy controls and somewhat outdated graphics, this game might be fun to play if you're really into these kinds of games.”
  • music
    26 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has received mixed reviews; while some players find it relaxing and suitable for casual gameplay, others criticize it as repetitive and lacking energy. Many users suggest that a more engaging soundtrack could enhance the overall experience, although some appreciate the ability to listen to their own music or podcasts while playing. Overall, the music is seen as a secondary aspect that could benefit from improvement.

    • “Great game if you want to occupy yourself with something for a few hours while listening to music/podcasts.”
    • “I really enjoyed playing under the music of the radio 'doser core'.”
    • “It has a nice gameplay feel and has nice music to go along with it.”
    • “For this part, I don't know what to say; there wasn't anything special about the music.”
    • “The classic music wasn't that attractive to the game.”
    • “I have been looking into this game for some time; the idea of the game is great, but possibly a better soundtrack would make it even better.”
  • grinding
    19 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be excessively tedious and time-consuming, often comparing it unfavorably to other simulation games like farming simulators. The vehicle controls are described as awkward, and the limited mission structure contributes to a frustrating experience, making it feel like a chore rather than an engaging gameplay element. Overall, those seeking a more streamlined or enjoyable simulation experience may be disappointed.

    • “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
    • “It is simply too tedious.”
    • “The other simulators are tedious and time consuming (partly because it's simulation-focused).”
    • “If you enjoy tedious, limited 3D puzzle games masquerading as a simulation, this is the game for you.”
  • humor
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is consistently praised, with players finding it both intuitive and relaxing. Many highlight the amusing bugs and quirky vehicle interactions, which add a lighthearted touch without detracting from the overall experience. Overall, the game is recommended for its diverse and entertaining comedic elements.

    • “Equipment is a little buggy, but for me, it only failed in funny ways that don't ruin the game.”
    • “And driving some vehicles will show you some pretty silly mistakes too; just look at the wheels of your Ford pickup truck, you'll notice something funny.”
    • “Recommended because it's pretty funny.”
  • stability
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Overall, the game's stability is marked by some noticeable glitches, particularly with equipment, but many players find these issues to be humorous rather than game-breaking. Despite the bugs, the game runs smoothly after a period without updates, leading to a mixed but generally positive perception of its stability.

    • “I would say it's fluent and bug-free, especially after such a long time without updates.”
    • “Game has its glitches.”
    • “Equipment is a little buggy but for me it only failed in funny ways that don't ruin the game.”
  • optimization
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's optimization has received mixed feedback, with some users experiencing stuttering issues attributed to a lack of vertical sync. While the visuals are generally acceptable and the gameplay runs smoothly, players with higher-end graphics cards, like the GTX 1080, report difficulty maintaining 60fps at 1080p, particularly on certain maps. Overall, there is a consensus that the game could benefit from further optimization.

    • “Looks decent, runs smoothly, and some aspects of the demolition are surprisingly fun.”
    • “Visuals are really okay for this type of game, though it could have been optimized better. As a GTX 1080 user, I am not able to maintain 60fps in 1080p and drop to the mid-thirties on one of the maps.”
    • “The stuttering issues seem to be because of a lack of vertical sync.”
    • “Visuals are really okay for this type of game, though it could have been optimized better. I'm a GTX 1080 user and I'm not able to maintain 60fps in 1080p, dropping to the mid-thirties on one of the maps.”
    • “The stuttering issues seem to be because of a lack of vertical sync.”
  • monetization
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Reviews indicate a strong sentiment against the monetization strategies in simulation and casual games, with many players perceiving them as underdeveloped cash grabs that prioritize profit over engaging gameplay.

    • “I find most of these titles to be boring, blunt, and underdeveloped cash grabs.”
    • “The monetization strategy feels exploitative and detracts from the overall experience.”
    • “It's frustrating to see so many paywalls in a game that could be enjoyable without them.”

Buy Demolish & Build 2017

10h Median play time
10h Average play time
10-10h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 2 analyzed playthroughs

Videos

Games Like Demolish & Build 2017

Demolish & Build 2018 Image
Construction Simulator Image
Construction Simulator 2015 Image
House Builder Image
Farmer's Dynasty Image