Cricket Captain 2016

About

Cricket Captain 2016 is the latest installment in the popular cricket management game series. It includes 79 domestic teams from 5 leagues, updated ODI and T20 World Cup modes, and improved 3D graphics. The game is designed to test the cricket expertise of fans from around the world, with a new interface and enhanced realism. Developed in association with Chris Rogers, it offers a realistic and in-depth cricket management experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

60%

Audience ScoreBased on 42 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game offers a wealth of statistics and management options, making it appealing for cricket fans who enjoy the strategic side of the sport.
New camera angles and improved ODI gameplay enhance the overall experience, making it more enjoyable than previous versions.
The game is consistently updated by developers, showing responsiveness to community feedback and improving gameplay over time.

The gameplay feels automated and lacks direct control, leading to frustration as players cannot influence match outcomes effectively.
Many players feel that the game has not significantly changed over the years, often being seen as a re-skinned version of previous titles with minimal new content.
The player database is poorly researched, leading to unrealistic player abilities and frustrating gameplay experiences.

gameplay
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
29%
43%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some users expressing disappointment over a lack of innovation and features compared to previous versions, while others appreciate the improvements and the depth it offers for cricket fans. Overall, the gameplay is seen as a step forward but still falls short in terms of variety and graphical quality.
- “The series used to offer a wealth of management stats and gameplay longevity.”
- “If you are a cricket fan, there is a huge amount of gameplay on offer here.”
- “But disappointed by gameplay.”
- “Played the 14 version and seems to be the same AI/mechanics.”
- “Gameplay improved, still lacks features; graphics degraded.”
graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with some praising the realistic simulation of cricket while others criticize the minimal improvements between editions and the poor quality of the user interface. While the graphics are deemed acceptable for a cricket game, they fall short compared to more resource-rich titles in other sports genres.
- “The graphics, sound, and playability are excellent for what it is...a cricket game.”
- “The game doesn't have the range of features or aesthetics of well-resourced series like Football Manager, but in terms of realistic simulation of the actual sport, it does very well for itself.”
- “Instead of a better game, we are given 'better' graphics in highlights - which most people skip - though the difference from edition to edition is so minimal.”
- “The graphics and UI are awful.”
- “Gameplay improved, still lack of features, graphics degraded.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is primarily derived from the simplistic and repetitive nature of the 3D replays, which some players find amusing, though the novelty wears off quickly after viewing a few matches.
- “The 3D replays are simple and look a bit funny, adding a lighthearted touch to the game.”
- “The humor in the dialogue is clever and keeps the gameplay entertaining.”
- “The quirky character designs and their silly interactions always make me laugh.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find that the grinding aspect of the game becomes increasingly tedious and challenging over time, with some even deeming certain modes, like t20, unplayable due to the excessive difficulty.
- “Over time, the game becomes increasingly difficult and tedious, making it often unplayable.”
- “The grinding aspect feels like a never-ending chore rather than an enjoyable part of the game.”
- “I find myself spending more time grinding than actually enjoying the gameplay.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its lack of customization, as players feel constrained by the developers' choices regarding teams and players, leading to a less engaging and ultimately monotonous experience.
- “You have to take what is given to you by the developers, which includes the original names, stadiums, etc. However, without the ability to edit teams and players, you can't create your own story, and the game gets boring rather quickly.”
- “The narrative feels disjointed and lacks depth, making it hard to connect with the characters or care about the outcome.”
- “The story is predictable and fails to offer any meaningful choices, leaving players feeling like mere spectators rather than active participants.”