Coins Invaders

About

Coins Invaders is a single player casual action adventure game. It was developed by Netdreams and was released on February 15, 2022. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Save Bitcoin from this currency madness by destroying altcoins while the Fed keeps us in this currency issuance currency madness

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

73%

Audience ScoreBased on 11 reviews

humor3 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game offers a humorous take on the classic Space Invaders concept with a modern crypto theme.
Controls are easy to learn, making it accessible for players looking for a quick gaming experience.
Some players find the game fun and entertaining for its short duration, especially if they enjoy memes and lighthearted stories.

The gameplay is repetitive and lacks variety, with no new enemies or levels to keep players engaged.
The graphics are considered poor and outdated, failing to meet modern gaming standards.
Despite being free, the game has received a dismal reception, with very few players engaging with it on platforms like Steam.

graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
The graphics have received mixed reviews, with some users criticizing the outdated 2D retro assets that feel more suited for browser or mobile games, especially given the advancements in technology since the mid-1990s. Conversely, others appreciate the modern graphics and improved visuals compared to classic games, noting enhancements in gameplay experience. Overall, the visuals seem to be a significant point of contention among players.
- “Fast-paced game with modern-day graphics and easy controls that seamlessly transitions from location A to B to C and so on.”
- “If you played Space Invaders, then it's about the same game, just with significantly better graphics and a bit of extra story.”
- “On the topic of visuals, the weak-looking 2D retro assets seem like they'd be more at home in a browser game or a mobile app.”
- “There’s no excuse for such poor 2D graphics in 2025, especially considering that 3D graphics accelerators hit the mainstream of PC gaming in the mid-1990s with cards like the ATI Rage and Voodoo3D.”
- “If you played Space Invaders, then it's about the same game, just with way better graphics and a bit of extra story.”
gameplay
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The gameplay has been criticized for being a mere reskin of existing mechanics, particularly resembling classic titles like Space Invaders, with a superficial "cryptobro" theme. Reviewers note that the core gameplay remains unchanged, raising concerns about originality and potential copyright issues. Overall, the gameplay experience is deemed unsatisfactory and lacking innovation.
- “Gameplay is identical; it's been reskinned with a 'cryptobro' theme, but gameplay is identical. This wouldn't pass the 'squint' test that proved catastrophic for Xio in Tetris Holdings LLC vs. Xio Interactive Inc. (New Jersey District Court, 2012).”
- “Gameplay is awful; they copied Space Invaders, added their own sprites, and called it quits.”
- “Yes, core game mechanics, look, and feel are all copyright enforceable, although at this point in time Taito has not yet taken legal action... it's never off the cards.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
75%
The story is generally perceived as low quality, primarily serving as a humorous backdrop rather than a serious narrative. While some find it entertaining and fun, it is often compared to classic games like Space Invaders, with improved graphics but not much depth.
- “A little long, but it's a fun story.”
- “If you played Space Invaders, then it's about the same game, just with way better graphics and a bit of extra story.”
- “The story is lacking; it's funny but of very low quality.”
- “The story feels more like a video for laughs than a serious narrative.”
- “If you've played Space Invaders, the story is about the same, just with better graphics and a bit of extra content.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
Players criticize the grinding aspect of the game, noting the lack of level selection and repetitive gameplay due to minimal enemy variety and few levels. This leads to a tedious experience primarily focused on grinding for achievements, contributing to a perception of low replay value.
- “No level select for grinding achievements. I mean, the game is honestly some of the worst of the worst on Steam, but I wanted to let you know.”
- “I should note that it can get repetitive after a while, as there are no new enemies and barely any levels. So, there isn't really any replay value other than grinding for the achievements.”
- “The grinding feels endless and tedious, making it hard to stay engaged with the game.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The humor in the game is noted to be amusing, but it is often overshadowed by a lack of quality in the overall story.
- “The humor in this game is absolutely hilarious, making even the most mundane tasks entertaining.”
- “I couldn't stop laughing at the witty dialogue and clever puns throughout the game.”
- “The comedic timing of the characters is spot on, adding a delightful layer to the gameplay.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the game's replayability limited due to a lack of new enemies and levels, leading to a repetitive experience. The primary incentive for replaying is grinding for achievements rather than engaging gameplay.
- “It can get repetitive after a while, as there are no new enemies and barely any levels, so there isn't really any replay value other than grinding for achievements.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back since the gameplay doesn't change and the content is limited.”
- “The lack of variety in missions and challenges makes replaying the game feel more like a chore than an enjoyable experience.”