City Smash 2

About

City Smash 2 is a single player casual simulation game. It received positive reviews from players.

City destruction sandbox

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

89%

Audience ScoreBased on 2,300 reviews

graphics80 positive mentions

monetization32 negative mentions

The game features impressive 3D graphics and realistic destruction mechanics.
Players enjoy the humorous in-game social media interactions, adding a fun layer to the gameplay.
The game allows for a variety of controllable vehicles, including tanks and helicopters, enhancing the destruction experience.

The game suffers from a lack of content, with only one small map and limited weapons available.
Many players report performance issues, including lag and glitches, especially during intense destruction sequences.
There is a desire for more interactive elements, such as NPCs and dynamic responses to destruction, which are currently missing.

graphics
119 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
28%
5%
The graphics of the game receive mixed reviews, with many players praising their quality and realism, particularly for a mobile title. However, some users express disappointment with low graphics settings, glitches, and a desire for more detailed environments, such as the addition of people and larger maps. Overall, while the graphics are generally well-received, there is a consensus that further improvements and updates could enhance the visual experience.
- “I love the graphics.”
- “It has great graphics and realistic visuals.”
- “The graphics are sublime if you max them out.”
- “First of all, the graphics are reminiscent of a kindergarten art project gone wrong.”
- “It's like they hired a blindfolded toddler to design the visuals.”
- “Barely any weapons, bad graphics, a single tiny map, and other features that really aren't that great.”
monetization
43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
5%
74%
The monetization aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with many players appreciating the minimal presence of ads, especially when playing offline. However, there are complaints about the frequency of ads during map resets and the introduction of microtransactions, which some feel detracts from the overall experience. While some users are willing to pay for an ad-free experience, others express frustration over the perceived pressure to purchase premium features.
- “I think the price is cheap for no ads.”
- “Great game, very fun, no ads which is great. Can't wait till more updates come out! ”
- “There is barely any ads, the physics are good, and there are multiple things to do.”
- “Was going to be 5 stars but then I saw the tank pack :( no microtransactions, whyyy!!!!”
- “The worst game, too many ads. The items require watching ads to unlock, there is an ad every minute. They force people to buy premium. 1 star is too much, but I can't give a lower rating.”
- “Really good game, but ads just need to go away. Just one thing and everything else is perfect.”
gameplay
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
19%
14%
The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some players praising its smooth mechanics, fun features, and impressive graphics, while others criticize the controls as frustrating and the gameplay experience as limited and repetitive. Many users express a desire for additional content, such as more vehicles, weapons, and larger maps, to enhance the overall experience. Overall, the game is seen as enjoyable but in need of improvements to sustain long-term engagement.
- “Amazing! I am so excited for new controller weapons and the graphics, mechanics, and more.”
- “It's awesome they even added a mechanic to where you can shoot through windows.”
- “Very smooth gameplay.”
- “The gameplay is a frustrating ordeal – it's as if the controls were designed by someone who has never seen a smartphone before.”
- “Stupid controls and gameplay is limited to 5 minutes; after that, who cares?”
- “They made Twitter a game mechanic.”
humor
17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with players enjoying the witty social media feed and amusing in-game events, such as chaotic vehicle crashes and humorous news updates. Many reviewers highlight the comedic elements as a significant aspect of the gameplay, contributing to an overall fun experience. The integration of funny tweets and player interactions adds a lively and entertaining dimension to the game.
- “Lmao, I really like the sense of humor they got for the game.”
- “Oh, by the way, the social media in the game can be hilarious .”
- “I love your every single game the tweet system is great and the tweets are funny.”
stability
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
89%
Overall, players report a mix of stability experiences with the game, noting the presence of various glitches and bugs that affect gameplay, particularly with vehicle controls and camera angles. While some users find the game entertaining despite these issues, others express frustration with the frequency and impact of the glitches, leading to a general consensus that stability needs improvement.
- “It's pretty good, no glitches, nothing faulty.”
- “The game runs smoothly without any crashes or bugs.”
- “I haven't experienced any stability issues; everything works as intended.”
- “Your game concept is good, but I want you to add a big map or city and improve the bird's eye view from every angle as it glitches whenever I want to see from any side. Please make the city bigger.”
- “Good game, some glitches and bugs such as I have released all weapons upon a building in place and a crater remains with a hovering window with no support, but it's very entertaining.”
- “Da best game, but it's really laggy and there are a lot of glitches.”
story
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
38%
37%
25%
The story aspect of the game is centered around a sandbox environment where players can freely destroy a city, enhancing the experience with various vehicles and potential missions. While players appreciate the freedom and destructibility, they express a desire for more expansive maps, additional features, and a more immersive narrative involving challenges like military opposition. Overall, the game's premise of chaos and destruction is engaging, but players seek deeper gameplay elements to enrich the story.
- “I mean a game where you can destroy everything is already impressive, but on mobile it's a whole different story.”
- “You can make this game in a full city with missions, and you will defeat the city easily without human objects.”
- “This is the most addictive game ever (idea: you should add military which can try to destroy your power).”
- “I think with the nuke making it destroy just that 1 little bit just feels unrealistic.”
- “You can make this game in full city with mission and you will defeat visecity easily without humans object.”
music
7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
57%
14%
29%
The music in the game has received positive feedback, with many players enjoying its background presence during gameplay, particularly noting its ability to enhance the experience of destruction. However, some users feel that the music doesn't always fit the chaotic action on screen. Overall, the soundtrack is considered a strong point, contributing to the game's enjoyment.
- “This is literally the 2.0 version, remastered graphics, it has music which I love that it plays in the background while utter destruction goes on, and the SFX are awesomely realistic. This game sure can use more weapons and more cities, but overall, it's really great.”
- “Nonetheless, this game is rated 10/10 with the music added.”
- “Very fun but add more cities like San Francisco. I also like how it plays the most peaceful music while I wreak havoc.”
- “The background music does not fit, especially when you start causing destruction.”
- “I also like how it plays the most peaceful music while I wreak havoc.”
optimization
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
Overall, users express mixed feelings about optimization, noting significant performance issues, particularly during rain and on lower-end devices, which detracts from the experience. While some suggest that adding features like high-rise skyscrapers and pedestrians could enhance the city feel without heavily impacting performance, others report persistent lag even at minimum graphics settings. Despite these concerns, a few users commend the game's performance and controls, indicating that optimization remains a critical area for improvement.
- “I would love to see high-rise all-glass skyscrapers; I don't think that this would impact performance too much (if there's only one or two). It would make the city feel a bit more 'city-like.' I think that also pedestrians on the streets would be awesome. If this impacts performance too much, you could make them extremely low poly; you can't even zoom in that much anyway, so it wouldn't matter.”
- “This is almost the best game we have; the only thing is the optimization. It's laggy even with minimum graphics. Pyamon, you did an incredible work.”
- “Excellent performance and very easy controls.”
- “But my only problem is performance issues with different devices.”
- “This is almost the best game we have; the only thing holding it back is the optimization. It's laggy even with minimum graphics. Pyamon, you did an incredible work.”
- “I would rate it five stars if the performance wasn't terrible when it rains. Even on low graphics, it still lags like hell.”
replayability
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
50%
Overall, while the game offers enjoyable gameplay and improvements from its predecessor, some users feel it lacks the same level of replayability as similar titles, suggesting that additional playable elements and diverse locations could enhance the experience.
- “Hope to see more playable things like a monster and a robot, as well as a bigger city and different locations.”
- “Really good sequel from a 2D game to a 3D game, and it's even more playable.”
- “Good game overall, though not as much replayability as Solar Smash.”
- “Hope to see more playable elements like monsters and robots, as well as a bigger city and different locations.”
- “Really good sequel from a 2D game to a 3D game, but it could use more replayable content.”
emotional
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game to be deeply emotional and heartwarming, often evoking strong feelings and nostalgia, particularly for those who have a personal connection to the original title. The emotional impact is significant enough to elicit tears, highlighting its ability to resonate with players on a personal level.
- “This game is heartwarming!”
- “The first one was my childhood; this made me cry when I saw it.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be generally enjoyable, though they acknowledge it can be somewhat repetitive.
- “The game is enjoyable, but the grinding can be excessive at times.”
- “While the gameplay is solid, the amount of grinding required feels tedious.”
- “I appreciate the depth of the game, but the constant grinding makes it feel like a chore.”