CGENcore

About

CGENcore is a single player casual simulation game. It was developed by O L Y M P U S and was released on February 16, 2019. It received neutral reviews from players.

Become the Crypto Tycoon! The more you click, the richer you get. Your goal is to collect as much Crypto as you can, buy as much tech as you can and conquer the world!

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

53%

Audience ScoreBased on 53 reviews

monetization3 negative mentions

The game is free, making it accessible to everyone.
It has a functional idle mechanic, allowing players to progress without constant clicking.
Some players found it enjoyable for short bursts of time, making it a decent way to pass the time.

The game lacks content and depth, with many players finishing it in under an hour.
It is criticized for being a basic and repetitive clicker game with little to no innovation.
There are complaints about the graphics and overall presentation being bland and uninteresting.

gameplay
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
34%
33%
The gameplay is described as initially riveting but tends to become stale after a short period, indicating a need for significant improvements to maintain player interest.
- “Riveting gameplay”
- “Gameplay becomes stale about 15 minutes before I stopped playing; it needs a significant amount of work to become interesting.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization strategy of this game is commendable for being free, which contrasts with typical cash grabs seen in template/asset flips. However, the overall value is questioned, as it lacks originality and substance, suggesting players should seek out more authentic games from genuine developers.
- “While template/asset flips like these are typically done as cash grabs, the developer made this free, which is laudable, I guess. However, as a template/asset flip, this has little to no value for gamers and should be avoided in favor of games from genuine developers who don't rely on construction kits.”
- “The monetization strategy feels exploitative, with constant prompts to spend money on in-game items that should be earnable through gameplay.”
- “It's frustrating to see a game that could be great bogged down by aggressive monetization tactics that prioritize profit over player experience.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
The graphics are generally praised, with users highlighting their quality and visual appeal.
- “The graphics are stunning and truly immersive!”
- “The visuals are incredibly detailed and vibrant.”
- “I was blown away by the beautiful graphics and art style!”
- “The graphics look outdated and lack detail, making the game feel less immersive.”
- “Character models are poorly designed and animations are stiff, which detracts from the overall experience.”
- “The environments are bland and repetitive, failing to create a visually engaging world.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The reviews indicate confusion regarding the concept of "story" in the game, with some users questioning its definition and relevance. This suggests that the narrative may be unclear or poorly developed, leaving players uncertain about its significance.
humor
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game has been widely criticized, with many players expressing that it fails to elicit any laughter or amusement.
- “Not funny, didn't laugh!”
- “The jokes fell flat and felt forced.”
- “I expected more clever humor, but it was mostly cringeworthy.”
replayability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Users generally find the replayability of the game to be high, citing various choices, multiple endings, and diverse character builds that encourage multiple playthroughs. Additionally, the presence of random events and evolving gameplay mechanics keeps the experience fresh and engaging. Overall, players appreciate the depth and variety that enhance the game's longevity.
- “The game offers a multitude of choices that significantly alter the storyline, making each playthrough feel fresh and exciting.”
- “With various character builds and strategies to explore, I find myself coming back to this game time and again.”
- “The dynamic world and random events ensure that no two playthroughs are ever the same, keeping the experience engaging.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to go back and play it again.”
- “The lack of meaningful choices means that replaying the game feels more like a chore than an enjoyable experience.”
- “After finishing the main storyline, I found no compelling reason to explore the game further.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally find the grinding in the game to be average, suggesting that it neither feels excessively tedious nor particularly rewarding, striking a balance that may appeal to some but leave others wanting more engagement.
- “The grinding in this game feels tedious and repetitive, making it hard to stay engaged.”
- “I found the grinding to be excessively time-consuming, which detracted from the overall enjoyment of the game.”
- “The grind is so monotonous that it often feels like a chore rather than a fun part of the gameplay.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for lacking any sound or music, which detracts from the overall experience. Reviewers suggest that incorporating audio elements could significantly enhance the game's appeal and quality.
- “No sound, no music, not a single sound in the game.”
- “Gussy it up a bit with better art and some sound/music, and you have yourself a solid product.”