Candy Golf
- June 27, 2024
- Candy games studios
STORY: Minigolf game with 3 different levels which all has 14 holes. So play totally 42 holes alone or against difficult bots. Levels has candy themes. So lot of different obstacles like donuts, ramps, windmilss, chocolate bars etc. Take a swing at this amazing mini-golf game! Enjoy the realistic gameplay. Try to play every hole under par score and also try to beat bots. So can you beat this game …
Reviews
- The game is simple and easy to play, making it suitable for casual gamers.
- Some players find it enjoyable for passing the time, with a sense of satisfaction from completing levels.
- It has minimalistic design elements that some users appreciate.
- The game is criticized as an asset flip, lacking originality and depth.
- There are numerous typos and poor quality in the store page description, indicating low effort in development.
- The presence of fake positive reviews raises concerns about review manipulation and the game's credibility.
- story2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
The story aspect of the game is criticized for its lack of diversity in locations, graphics, and plot, with some reviewers questioning the potential for a compelling narrative in a golf-themed game. While the plot's limitations are acknowledged, there is a suggestion that more creativity could enhance the storytelling experience.
“It lacks diversity in locations, graphics, and plot. The matter of the plot is debatable because I can't imagine what kind of plot you can have in golf, but something can be thought up.”
“The story feels incredibly shallow and uninspired, leaving players with little motivation to progress.”
“There is a complete absence of character development, making it hard to connect with the narrative.”
- monetization1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The monetization aspect of the game has been criticized for the presence of suspicious reviews, which are often written in broken English or Russian and appear shortly after launch. These reviews seem to originate from accounts that consistently promote the game alongside other low-quality titles, suggesting a potential manipulation of the review system to enhance sales for what many consider asset flips or cash grabs.
“The monetization strategy feels exploitative, with constant prompts to spend money on in-game purchases that don't enhance the experience.”
“It seems like the game was designed around making money rather than providing a fun experience, with overpriced items and limited free content.”
“The aggressive monetization tactics overshadow the gameplay, making it hard to enjoy the game without feeling pressured to spend more.”
- graphics1 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -200 % neutral mentions
- 300 % negative mentions
The graphics are criticized for their lack of diversity in locations and overall design, which detracts from the visual experience. While the plot's simplicity is acknowledged, some believe there is potential for more creative storytelling within the game's context.
“The graphics are outdated and fail to impress, making the game feel less immersive.”
“The environments are bland and repetitive, lacking the detail and variety expected in modern games.”
“Character models look stiff and lifeless, which detracts from the overall experience.”