Business Tour

About

Business Tour is a single player and multiplayer casual real-time strategy game. It was developed by 8Floor and was released on July 27, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

Business Tour is an online board game based on the most popular tabletop game in the world.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

56%

Audience ScoreBased on 17,410 reviews

gameplay73 positive mentions

monetization64 negative mentions

The gameplay offers a mix of familiar mechanics and small twists that keep it engaging and fun, especially in multiplayer sessions.
The colorful and vibrant graphics, along with the immersive atmosphere, enhance the overall experience and make the game visually appealing.
The humor and unpredictability of the game create entertaining moments, particularly when played with friends, making it a fun casual gaming option.

The game heavily relies on pay-to-win mechanics and unbalanced RNG, leading to a frustrating experience for non-paying players.
Frequent bugs, crashes, and server instability significantly hinder gameplay, making it feel like a 'buggy mess' for many users.
The monetization model is criticized as a 'cash grab,' with intrusive ads and a difficult in-game currency system that detracts from overall enjoyment.

gameplay
321 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
23%
66%
11%
The gameplay of "Business Tour" is a mixed bag, with many players enjoying its casual, accessible mechanics reminiscent of classic board games like Monopoly, while others criticize its heavy reliance on pay-to-win elements and unbalanced RNG mechanics that detract from the competitive experience. While the core gameplay loop of rolling dice, buying properties, and bankrupting opponents can be engaging, issues such as server instability, bugs, and a lack of strategic depth lead to a frustrating experience for many. Overall, the game offers potential for fun multiplayer sessions, but its flaws significantly hinder enjoyment.
- “Gameplay-wise, it has this mix of familiar elements and small twists that keep things from feeling stale.”
- “If you’re looking for something that balances comfort with challenge, familiar mechanics with fresh touches, and a world that’s just fun to be in, then I genuinely think this one is worth giving a shot.”
- “The core gameplay is incredibly engaging, offering all the strategic depth and competitive thrill you'd expect from a property-trading board game.”
- “Business Tour is a completely unfair game; it's clearly pay-to-win, full of rigged mechanics, and the RNG is broken. The game constantly favors certain players, making it a total waste of time.”
- “The gameplay itself is just a poorly made Monopoly clone, with boring mechanics and little to no real strategy.”
- “The game is dependent on luck, but that's just a game mechanic. The gameplay is almost purely luck-based, and whoever rolls first seems to get an advantage.”
humor
277 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
98%
2%
The humor in the game is widely praised, with many players finding it particularly entertaining when played with friends, leading to hilarious moments and competitive banter. While some reviews note that the game can become repetitive or frustrating due to its luck-based mechanics and monetization issues, the overall consensus is that it provides a fun and funny experience, especially in group settings. The game's quirky animations and unpredictable outcomes contribute to its comedic appeal, making it a popular choice for casual gaming sessions.
- “One minute you’re making deals, the next you’re laughing maniacally while bankrupting your best mate and buying up every property in sight.”
- “The game is completely unpredictable and hilarious, making it perfect for playing with friends.”
- “This game is the mother of all emotional rollercoasters and hilarious with friends.”
- “Unfunny and repetitive.”
- “This game is not funny; I always pay 5 million when I have 1 house.”
- “A very bad game, only x64 for no particular reason, pay-to-win to hell and back and not funny.”
monetization
150 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
5%
52%
43%
The monetization model of the game has drawn significant criticism, with many players labeling it a "cash grab" due to its heavy reliance on microtransactions and pay-to-win mechanics. Users express frustration over intrusive ads, the difficulty of earning in-game currency, and the perception that gameplay outcomes are rigged in favor of paying players. While some acknowledge that the game can still be enjoyable with friends if microtransactions are disabled, the overall sentiment is that the monetization strategy detracts from the experience.
- “While the game is not without its flaws, such as potential connection issues and the presence of in-app purchases, it provides a fun and engaging experience for fans of the genre.”
- “The gameplay itself is enjoyable, but the monetization model and the limited replay value make it a hard sell for most players.”
- “As others have said, the microtransactions aren't as bad as the negative reviews make them out to be, as you can turn off gadgets when you create a game, and I believe most people do because nobody likes a pay-to-win game.”
- “The in-game currency is hard to come by, and the game heavily pushes you to watch ads for bonuses or to continue a game if you go bankrupt early.”
- “What was once a game of strategy and luck is now a blatant cash grab where VIP players receive unfair advantages, making it nearly impossible for non-paying players to have a fair game.”
- “This game turned into a pathetic cash grab.. shameful.”
graphics
139 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
29%
62%
9%
The graphics of the game are generally described as colorful, clean, and appealing, contributing to an immersive experience that enhances gameplay. While many players appreciate the vibrant art style and whimsical animations, some critiques highlight that the visuals can be basic or reminiscent of mobile games, lacking cutting-edge detail. Overall, the graphics are seen as adequate for the genre, balancing charm with simplicity, though opinions vary on their overall impact on the gaming experience.
- “The visuals are clean and appealing, the interface is intuitive, and the overall experience is polished.”
- “Business Tour features a bright and cheerful art style with colorful boards and quirky animations that make it visually appealing.”
- “The colorful and vibrant graphics make every board feel like a living, breathing world that you're stepping into.”
- “The graphics were also quite basic and didn’t capture the excitement I expected.”
- “I didn't even care that the graphics were straight from the most generic pre-packaged mobile games.”
- “The modes are all shit and boring af, and the graphics look like a shitty Wii shovelware game.”
story
95 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
9%
67%
24%
The reviews for the game's story aspect are overwhelmingly negative, with many users stating that there is no story at all. A few comments mention a unique or humorous narrative, but these are overshadowed by the consensus that the game primarily focuses on gameplay rather than storytelling. Overall, players seem to find the lack of a substantial narrative disappointing, with some sarcastically commenting on the absence of a meaningful plot.
- “This game offers a unique story unlike any other multiplayer co-op I have witnessed.”
- “This game has one of the most in-depth stories I have ever played.”
- “Sick game, insane graphics, 10/10 storyline would play again.”
- “☑ no story”
- “Only the main villain has a real presence throughout the game, whereas everyone else feels introduced abruptly only to fall by your hand, all within the same mission.”
- “It made sense to me to play Emily first, but her story felt lackluster, like people at every turn were saying 'check your royal privilege' despite my efforts to resolve everyone's problems without drawing blood.”
stability
80 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is heavily criticized, with users reporting frequent bugs, crashes, and connection issues that significantly hinder gameplay. Many players experience game freezes, especially during multiplayer sessions, and express frustration over the reliance on a subscription model for private games. Overall, the game is described as a "buggy mess," with numerous glitches that detract from the overall experience.
- “And then there are the tech glitches—nonstop bugs, crashes, multiplayer rooms that won’t load or exit, and a tidal wave of bots that ruin everything.”
- “The game often freezes and if you just bought a ticket for a gold tournament, you will lose them irreversibly.”
- “This game has such massive connection glitches and bugs that the issues become unbearable.”
music
53 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
62%
13%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players praising its catchy and relaxing qualities that enhance the overall experience, while others find it annoying or forgettable. Many users appreciate the vibrant art style that complements the soundtrack, but some express frustration over the audio settings being defaulted to off. Overall, the music seems to be a divisive aspect, with opinions ranging from enjoyment to irritation.
- “Riveting gameplay tied with an award-winning soundtrack makes playing this game a perfect pastime with your friends or should I say 'business enemies!'”
- “Additionally, the game's vibrant art style and catchy soundtrack add to its overall charm and appeal, creating a visually striking and immersive experience that is sure to captivate players of all ages.”
- “Honestly - music is great in my opinion - just to have it running in the background.”
- “The sound effects and background music are serviceable but not particularly memorable.”
- “Fucking annoying music that makes me regress in development.”
- “Basically this game is like an old song played to death on the radio.”
grinding
29 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
10%
59%
31%
The reviews overwhelmingly highlight that grinding in the game is excessively tedious and time-consuming, often requiring players to invest an unrealistic amount of time to progress. Many users describe the experience as soul-crushing and frustrating, with some suggesting that it feels like a second life is needed just to keep up with the demands of the gameplay. Overall, the grinding aspect is seen as a major drawback, detracting from the enjoyment and sense of accomplishment in the game.
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “A bit grindy... sometimes.”
- “One long, tedious grind.”
- “Business Tour boasts a gameplay experience so excruciatingly tedious and soul-crushing that it becomes a breeding ground for existential crises.”
- “Its diabolical graphics, mind-numbingly tedious gameplay, lack of content, broken online multiplayer, and predatory microtransactions have unleashed a relentless torrent of suffering, trauma, and depression upon unsuspecting souls.”
- “I ended up losing 9k chips in this way, which is equivalent to losing the 30 hours of hard grinding progress I had made.”
optimization
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
24%
52%
24%
Overall, the game's optimization has received mixed reviews, with many players reporting significant performance issues, including server problems, bugs, and crashes that disrupt gameplay. While some users noted improvements in recent updates, the consensus is that the game still requires substantial optimization to enhance the overall experience. A few players experienced smooth performance, but the majority expressed frustration with the game's current state.
- “Is well optimized”
- “Well optimized!”
- “Have no problems with it; runs smoothly.”
- “Optimization is so bad that the game sometimes thinks you should just stop playing and closes your game.”
- “Everyone is aware of the performance issues, and these still persist to this day.”
- “To set a precedent for future games, I can't recommend buying this unless they manage to fix all the performance issues and bugs, which doesn't seem to be happening anytime soon.”
emotional
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect of the game elicits a wide range of feelings, from laughter and joy to deep sadness and trauma, often leading to intense discussions among players. Many users describe it as an emotional rollercoaster that can strengthen friendships while simultaneously causing distress and financial strain. Overall, the game leaves a lasting impact on players, evoking nostalgia and complex emotions that can linger long after gameplay.
- “10/10, I laughed, I cried, I lost all my fake money.”
- “This game is the mother of all emotional rollercoasters and hilarious with friends.”
- “Incredible game, makes me emotional thinking about the joyous moments I've had playing this game.”
replayability
18 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
50%
17%
Overall, the game's replayability is highly praised for its creativity and the potential for unique strategies, especially in multiplayer settings. However, some players express concerns about diminishing replay value due to repetitive mechanics and a monetization model that may deter long-term engagement. While many find it infinitely replayable, others rate it significantly lower, indicating a mixed reception regarding its long-term appeal.
- “This adds an incredible layer of creativity and replayability, ensuring that games never feel stale and offering endless possibilities for unique strategies and inside jokes with your group.”
- “The ability to play with multiple players online adds a competitive edge and extends the game's replayability.”
- “Almost 4 years since I first played the special edition on PS4 and this is still one of the most enjoyable, immersive, and replayable games I've played, with only one game (The Witcher 3) coming close to the feeling I get playing this.”
- “This feels like a fairly steep price to pay for what is essentially a digital version of a board game, and it limits the game's replay value for those who are not willing to pay.”
- “The gameplay itself is enjoyable, but the monetization model and the limited replay value make it a hard sell for most players.”
- “Additionally, the game's replay value may diminish after extended play, as the mechanics and scenarios can start to feel repetitive over time.”
atmosphere
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
17%
50%
The atmosphere of the game is described as immersive and engaging, with a competitive edge that keeps players hooked, particularly during intense multiplayer matches. However, the design favors paying players, leading to an unbalanced and frustrating experience for those who opt not to spend real money.
- “The first thing I noticed is the atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere is immersive.”
- “The game's design favors paying players, creating an unbalanced and frustrating atmosphere for those who choose not to spend real money.”
- “Whether you're playing with friends or jumping into multiplayer matches with random players, the competitive atmosphere and intense bidding wars will keep you hooked for hours.”
- “Story and atmosphere”
character development
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The character development in the game has been criticized for its unappealing design, with some users finding it off-putting and suggesting that other games, like Monopoly, offer a better experience.
- “The character design looks disgusting to me; I'd rather play Monopoly than this. Trust me, don't waste your time.”
- “The character development feels shallow and uninspired, making it hard to connect with anyone in the game.”
- “I found the characters to be one-dimensional, lacking any real growth or depth throughout the story.”