The game has a fun, 'so bad it's good' quality that some players enjoy.
Graphics are better than expected, likely due to the use of stock assets.
Some players find it entertaining enough to play with friends or create their own game modes.
The game lacks meaningful single player content and has no active player base.
It is perceived as a low-effort asset flip with questionable monetization practices.
Many players feel disappointed and ripped off due to the game's quality and the cost of additional DLC.
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's story is perceived as lacking depth, with the developer relying on player interactions to compensate for insufficient storytelling and level design elements.
“The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design, etc. to the game.”
graphics
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game's graphics exceed expectations, though they appear to rely heavily on assets sourced from asset stores, which may detract from their originality.
“The game graphics look better than you might expect, but that's just because it looks like some or all of them are 'borrowed' from asset stores or elsewhere.”
“The visuals are underwhelming and feel outdated, lacking the polish you'd expect from a modern game.”
“Character models are poorly designed and animations are stiff, making the overall experience visually disappointing.”
music
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is polarizing, with some players finding it so bad that it becomes enjoyable, particularly enjoying nostalgic 2000s pop tracks while engaging in gameplay.