BOT.vinnik Chess: Mid-Century USSR Championships
- November 17, 2021
- Deep Green Games
The soviet digital teacher is back! This time he will teach you chess through memorable matches from the mid-century USSR Chess Championships (1940s, and 50s) ■ Learn the theory behind historical matches played by masters ■ Find out why chess pros chose the moves they did ■ Play hypothetical outcomes to understand why the losing player resigned ■ 150+ "best-move" type puzzles …
Reviews
Audience ScoreBased on 19 reviews
graphics1 positive mentions
- The hint system is very useful for beginner chess players, providing guidance without giving away the entire answer.
- The game offers fun and challenging puzzles that help improve chess skills while also providing interesting historical context about former chess champions.
- The charming personality, nice music, and aesthetics contribute to an enjoyable experience for chess enthusiasts.
- The visual and interface quality is low, with monochrome 2D retro pixel art that may not appeal to everyone.
- Each game contains only around 20 short puzzles, leading to questions about the necessity of launching multiple separate games.
- The game could have been delivered in a more accessible format, such as a browser game or video, making the price seem overly ambitious.
- graphics1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game are praised for their charm and aesthetic appeal, complementing the overall experience, especially considering its price point.
“For the price, it's a nice chess game with a charming personality and nice music and aesthetics.”
- music1 mentions
- 100 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 0 % negative mentions
The music in the game is praised for its charm and contributes positively to the overall aesthetic, enhancing the experience for players.
“For the price, it's a nice chess game with a charming personality and nice music and aesthetics.”
Positive mentions (%)Positive
Neutral mentions (%)Neutral
Negative mentions (%)Negative