bomber-un

About bomber-un

bomber-un is a single player casual simulation game. It was developed by Hardcore Studio and was released on April 5, 2018. It received neutral reviews from players.

The game requires you to blow up the stone blocks with extreme caution! Because you have a certain quantity of explosive by means of which you will blow up blocks.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip Games Like bomber-un

Looking for games like bomber-un? Here are top casual simulation recommendations, selected from player-similarity data — start with Easy puzzle: Landscape, The famous diver or Repeat the image: Animals.

Easy puzzle: Landscape

2020

Casual Puzzle

The famous diver

2018

Casual Simulation

Repeat the image: Animals

2018

Casual Puzzle

62%20reviews

Magic University

2024

Casual Puzzle

63%14reviews

Good puzzle

2020

Puzzle

41%16reviews

MOVEIT

2022

Casual Platformer

Run and Jump Little Vico

2021

Casual Platformer

PonGlow

Action

60%21reviews

Animals Memory: Monkeys

2021

Casual Puzzle

Astronaut: The Moon Eclipse

2018

Action

More games like bomber-un

Skip User Reviews

Reviews

57%Audience ScoreBased on 14 reviews

humor2 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

The game features simple, easy-to-understand Bomberman-style puzzle gameplay that can be completed relatively quickly.
Some players found the puzzles satisfying and enjoyed the quick puzzle challenges.
The humorous theme was appreciated by a few players, providing moments of joy and amusement.

The game is very short with minimal replayability, making some achievements feel unnecessary and tedious.
Graphics and audio are low quality, bland, and unpolished, resembling outdated Flash/Java games.
There are serious ethical concerns including asset flipping, uncredited use of assets, possible copyright infringement, fake reviews, and overall low effort, which harms player trust.

graphics
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 50% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions
The graphics rely on outdated retro pixel art, which feels simplistic and lacks polish. Resolution options merely scale the basic 2D assets without improving visual quality, resulting in a bland and unimpressive presentation.
- “A choice was made to use obsolete, decades old retro pixel art as a substitute for contemporary PC graphics.”
- “While there are options to change the resolution for the game, all this does is scale up the simplistic 2D art assets used to make the game, which makes little or no difference to the graphics quality.”
- “Without any other substantial graphics tweaks, it's not possible for gamers to improve the lacklustre 2D visuals.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
The monetization strategy is heavily criticized as a blatant cash grab, using minimal effort and recycled assets to quickly release low-quality games aimed at generating revenue rather than providing genuine player value. This approach often involves deceptive marketing and fake reviews to boost sales.
- “He took a basic Unity template for a puzzle game using Bomberman-style bomb placement, and a 'minimum viable' number of lazy slapped-together levels, and dumped it on Steam as yet another lazy cash grab in the shovelware section of the store.”
- “It got images of the DPRK's leader slapped on in the hopes it might go viral and earn a few more roubles for the asset flipper behind this, but make no mistake, this was never made as a serious game for gamers; it's just a cash grab.”
- “They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear almost exactly at the same time shortly after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 67% negative mentions
The music is generally seen as repetitive and monotone, failing to match the game's tone. However, some users find it nostalgically reminiscent of classic games like Star Control 2.
- “On a side note, the music reminds me of playing a real game like Star Control 2.”
- “Bland, unpolished graphics, and repetitive monotone music that does not fit the game.”
- “The music reminds me of playing a real game like Star Control 2.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 50% negative mentions
The gameplay is generally interesting but not particularly unique, with a notable frustration being a lengthy one-hour achievement that demands continuous window focus.
- “Worst of all is the long 1-hour gameplay achievement that requires you to keep the game window continuously focused.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The game features a hilarious theme that enhances the overall experience, with humor well integrated into its enjoyable and satisfying puzzles.
- “The puzzles were fantastic and satisfying to solve, and the theme of the game was hilarious.”
- “Funny game”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 0% neutral mentions, 100% negative mentions
Users feel the game lacks replayability, finding achievements like "play for 1 hour" unnecessary due to limited incentive to play again.
- “The play for 1 hour achievement is unnecessary as there really is no replayability.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
0% positive mentions, 100% neutral mentions, 0% negative mentions
The story aspect is mentioned, but no detailed information or opinions are provided by users.