Blonde Driver
- April 10, 2018
- Easy game
Get on Steam"Blonde Driver" is a casual racing game where players take on the role of a blonde driver, competing in various races and challenges. The game features easy-to-learn controls and a variety of tracks and vehicles to unlock. With its bright and bubbly art style, "Blonde Driver" provides a lighthearted and enjoyable racing experience.
PC
Windows
Reviews
- The game offers an easy way to unlock a large number of achievements quickly, making it appealing for achievement hunters.
- It has a low price point, which can make it a worthwhile purchase during sales for those interested in boosting their Steam profile.
- The developer provides a unique service by allowing users to request custom achievements, adding a personal touch for achievement collectors.
- The gameplay is simplistic and poorly executed, with clunky controls and a lack of clear objectives, making it frustrating to play.
- The game is essentially an asset flip, lacking originality and depth, which diminishes its value as a legitimate gaming experience.
- Many players report technical issues, including crashes and poor graphics, further detracting from the overall experience.
- gameplay18 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 56 % neutral mentions
- 44 % negative mentions
The gameplay is widely criticized for being simplistic and poorly executed, primarily serving as a vehicle for players to earn achievements rather than providing an engaging experience. Players note clunky controls, monotonous driving mechanics, and a lack of interesting content, leading to frustration and disappointment. Overall, the game fails to deliver a compelling gameplay experience, with many users suggesting it is only worth playing for the easy achievement points.
“The game is frustrating, the gameplay is monotonous, and the graphics are subpar at best.”
“Clunky controls, ugly interface, and very simplistic gameplay.”
“The driving mechanics are really poorly built and require upgrades to make the vehicle more exciting to drive.”
- graphics14 mentions
- 21 % positive mentions
- 50 % neutral mentions
- 29 % negative mentions
The graphics of the game have been widely criticized, with many users describing them as subpar and reminiscent of outdated titles, even comparing them unfavorably to games from the 1990s. Despite the game's technical demands causing some hardware strain, the overall visual quality is considered disappointing and frustrating.
“As I had this game idol unlocking the achievements, the graphics card got really loud as if I were playing The Witcher 3 on high settings.”
“The realism beats Need for Speed (released in 1994) with graphics that will put most Sega Genesis games to shame!”
“And the graphics?”
“I'm not sure what was happening there with that because the graphics in this game are bad.”
“The realism beats Need for Speed (released in 1994) with the graphics that will put most Sega Genesis games to shame!”
“The game is frustrating, the gameplay is monotonous, and the graphics are subpar at best.”
- humor4 mentions
- 50 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 50 % negative mentions
The humor in the game is perceived as initially amusing but quickly loses its appeal, leading some players to feel that it is not worth their time or investment. Overall, the comedic elements are seen as short-lived and not sufficient to sustain interest.
“Not funny... better instant refund games like that one.”
- grinding2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
Players primarily view grinding as a means to farm achievements, indicating that it serves more as a repetitive task rather than an engaging gameplay element.
“Just for achievement farming.”
“Just for achievement farming.”
- monetization2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- -50 % neutral mentions
- 150 % negative mentions
The monetization strategy of "Game for People/Easy Game" has been criticized for its unethical practices, including the repeated use of others' work as a means to generate quick profits, leading to perceptions of it being a cheap cash grab.
“The game has shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab.”
“The monetization strategy feels exploitative, prioritizing profit over player experience.”
“In-game purchases are overpriced and often necessary to progress, making it feel like a pay-to-win scenario.”
- story2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The reviews indicate a complete lack of story, with players expressing disappointment over the absence of engaging mechanics or narrative elements to maintain their interest in the game.
“There’s no story, no interesting mechanics, nothing to keep you playing.”
- stability2 mentions
- 0 % positive mentions
- 0 % neutral mentions
- 100 % negative mentions
The stability of the game has been widely criticized, with users reporting frequent bugs and a frustrating experience that detracts from overall enjoyment.
“It's frustrating, buggy, and just plain boring.”
“It's frustrating, buggy, and just plain boring.”
