Beasts Battle

About

Beasts Battle is a single player and multiplayer action game. It was developed by Greenolor Studio and was released on June 15, 2016. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Turn-based battles.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Skip User Reviews

79%

Audience ScoreBased on 28 reviews

graphics2 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

Beasts Battle offers accessible turn-based combat with straightforward mechanics, making it approachable for new players and those who prefer a relaxed pace.
The game features a light army-building and RPG-style progression system that keeps gameplay engaging through gradual expansion of options and tactical variations.
The inclusion of a local hotseat mode allows for social play, enhancing the experience by enabling competitive battles with friends.

The game's simplicity can lead to repetitive encounters and a lack of long-term depth, as difficulty often increases through tougher enemy statistics rather than new mechanics.
Visuals and animations are functional but lack polish, resulting in a presentation that feels basic and does not create a strong sense of atmosphere.
Resource management can become tedious, as players may need to grind for gold to recover lost troops, which can detract from the overall enjoyment of the game.

gameplay
10 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
20%
50%
30%
Beasts Battle offers a compact and accessible turn-based strategy experience, emphasizing deliberate pacing and straightforward mechanics that encourage tactical thinking. While the gameplay remains engaging through gradual expansion of options, it can become repetitive over time, with difficulty primarily increasing through tougher enemies rather than new mechanics. The game is best enjoyed in shorter sessions, though it suffers from an unbalanced leveling system that can hinder progression.
- “Beasts Battle is a compact fantasy strategy title that focuses on deliberate pacing, accessible mechanics, and classic turn-based combat rather than sweeping narrative or complex simulation.”
- “This gradual expansion of options helps keep the gameplay engaging over time, as new unit types and skills introduce small but meaningful tactical variations.”
- “While the mechanics are relatively simple compared to larger strategy titles, they encourage a methodical approach where poor positioning or reckless aggression can quickly lead to defeat.”
- “While this approach does not create a strong sense of atmosphere, it ensures that gameplay remains easy to follow and mechanically focused.”
- “I mentioned an unbalanced leveling rate, and it's probably the only true mechanical problem this game has - it follows the King's Bounty formula of letting you recruit units up to a maximum amount defined by a leadership score tied to your level, but until the endgame you gain levels faster than you gain money to recruit units, so any time you come close to filling up your army, you gain another level and need to spend thousands more money recruiting units.”
grinding
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players note that while some grinding is necessary to accumulate resources and troops, the overall time investment is relatively short, with complete playthroughs taking around 2 hours. However, the need to farm for gold after defeats can lead to repetitive gameplay, detracting from the desire to experiment with higher difficulty levels.
- “Resource loss after defeat can also slow progression, occasionally pushing players toward grinding rather than experimentation.”
- “However, once you cleared the overlord, you are stuck farming the level which you don't lose troops to recoup your heavy losses.”
- “But farming for gold to recoup your losses gets rather boring, when all I want to do is try to clear higher difficulties.”
graphics
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
67%
33%
The graphics are generally functional and readable, though they lack the polish of higher-budget titles. Many users find the visuals satisfactory for the price point, particularly appreciating the design of certain units like elephants, but note that overall quality could be improved.
- “The graphics are really good for 0.99; I love the design of the troops, especially the elephants.”
- “Visuals and animations are functional and readable, but they lack the flair or polish of higher-budget strategy games.”
story
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
67%
The story conveys a powerful moral about perseverance and the unpredictability of life, emphasizing that giving up can prevent one from achieving their potential. However, some users note that the narrative is quite brief and lacks a substantial storyline.
- “The moral of the story is that you never know what life has in store for you. If I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
- “The story is really short.”
- “There is no storyline.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The music in the game is noted for its relaxing qualities, providing a soothing experience for some players. However, others find it repetitive and irritating over time, suggesting a mixed reception regarding its overall impact.
- “The music is repetitive and becomes irritating after a while.”
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The atmosphere in the game is noted to be weak, as the design prioritizes clear gameplay mechanics over immersive environmental elements.
- “While this approach does not create a strong sense of atmosphere, it ensures that gameplay remains easy to follow and mechanically focused.”