Skip to main content

Battle for the Galaxy

Battle for the Galaxy Game Cover
44%Game Brain Score
humor
graphics, gameplay
44% User Score Based on 87 reviews

Platforms

PCWeb BrowserWindows
Battle for the Galaxy Game Cover

About

Battle for the Galaxy is a multiplayer casual strategy game. It was developed by AMT Games and was released on May 13, 2019. It received neutral reviews from players.

Battle for the Galaxy is a free, cross-platform MMO strategy game set in space, where you build and expand your base and military force. With immersive 3D visuals, you can construct and upgrade over 20 buildings, create a powerful galactic fleet, and engage in intense PvP battles to defend your base and loot resources. Ideal for those who enjoy building and managing sci-fi bases while engaging in strategic combat.

Skip User Reviews

44%
Audience ScoreBased on 87 reviews
humor1 positive mentions
monetization3 negative mentions

  • The game has a nice concept and art style, bringing back memories of past games.
  • It offers a good multiplayer experience and is enjoyable for casual play.
  • The graphics are comfortable, and the gameplay is simple yet engaging.
  • The game is heavily pay-to-win, requiring real money for a better experience.
  • Progression is slow, with long build times and frequent resource shortages.
  • It suffers from being a generic mobile port, lacking originality and polish.
  • graphics
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's graphics receive mixed reviews, with some players appreciating the nostalgic art style and beautiful 3D visuals, while others criticize them as mediocre and reminiscent of low-quality social media games. Overall, the graphics are described as comfortable and visually appealing, but not groundbreaking, with some noting that they do not significantly enhance the gameplay experience.

    • “Love the art style of the game; it brings back memories of some past times.”
    • “It has astonishing graphics, simple but deep gameplay, and a lot of growth potential.”
    • “The gameplay features futuristic units and buildings and beautiful 3D graphics.”
    • “Game graphics are comfortable as well as the game layout, but totally as bad as social media site games requiring you to pay to play such a simple game after wasting your time bothering with the tutorial.”
    • “- sound / music isn't much better than the graphics, to be honest.”
    • “The game is a copy of many others of the genre, with a different brand, different base story, and different visuals that 'flood' the mobile platforms.”
  • gameplay
    6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay has received mixed reviews, with some users criticizing its mechanics as overly complicated and uninviting for beginners, while others praise its stunning graphics and depth, highlighting the potential for growth and engagement. Comparisons to Clash of Clans suggest familiar mechanics, but with significant differences that may not appeal to all players.

    • “It has astonishing graphics, simple but deep gameplay, and a lot of growth potential.”
    • “The gameplay features futuristic units and buildings and beautiful 3D graphics.”
    • “Almost the same mechanics as Clash of Clans but with some crucial differences.”
    • “I wouldn't even suggest this game to beginning gamers to learn the mechanics of this game genre, let alone advertise it as free to play; clearly, it's not.”
    • “Game mechanics are poorly designed and frustrating.”
    • “Operations are just a sorry excuse for an event, forcing you to rebuild a base with even more frustrating game mechanics.”
  • monetization
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game features a heavy reliance on in-game purchases and numerous microtransactions, drawing comparisons to Clash of Clans but with less polish. Players feel that the monetization strategy detracts from the overall experience.

    • “This is just a Clash of Clans reskin with many more microtransactions and significantly less polish.”
    • “It has a heavy reliance on tempting you to make in-game purchases.”
    • “It also contains a lot of microtransactions.”
    • “This is just a Clash of Clans reskin with many more microtransactions and a lot less polish.”
  • stability
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is criticized for being buggy, with users reporting various non-fatal glitches that persist despite the game's long history. Additionally, there are concerns about unbalanced gameplay and slow progression mechanics, leading to frustrations among players.

    • “It is either buggy or the devs deliberately mess up certain aspects of the game.”
    • “Not only that, I also encountered quite a few bugs; though they're not fatal, for a game that's over 10 years old, I can't believe the devs still let it be this buggy.”
    • “Not bad, but buggy, unbalanced, somewhat pay-to-win, and the time for building/upgrading is ridiculously slow.”
  • story
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story is perceived as derivative, resembling many others in the genre with only minor variations in branding and visuals. While players find the gameplay challenging and engaging, they express frustration with the excessive wait times for building upgrades and the monetization strategy that encourages in-game purchases to expedite progress. Overall, the narrative lacks originality, but the competitive elements and community interactions provide some enjoyment.

    • “The game is a copy of many others in the genre, with a different brand, different base story, and different visuals that flood the mobile platforms.”
    • “The story feels generic and lacks originality, making it hard to stay engaged with the plot.”
    • “The narrative is poorly developed, leaving many plot points unresolved and characters underexplored.”
  • music
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game is generally considered underwhelming, with many users feeling it does not significantly enhance the overall experience, similar to the game's graphics.

    • “The sound and music aren't much better than the graphics, to be honest.”
    • “The music feels repetitive and lacks variety, making it hard to stay engaged.”
    • “I found the soundtrack to be uninspired and forgettable, which really detracted from the overall experience.”
  • humor
    1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is perceived as enjoyable and worth experiencing, though some players feel that the overall value is diminished by current pricing and treatment issues.

Skip Game Offers

Buy Battle for the Galaxy

Skip Videos

Videos

Skip Games Like Battle for the Galaxy

Games Like Battle for the Galaxy

War and Magic: Kingdom Reborn Image
Puzzle Breakers: Champions War ImagePuzzle Breakers: Champions War ImagePuzzle Breakers: Champions War Image
Battle Islands Image
Art of War 3:RTS strategy game ImageArt of War 3:RTS strategy game ImageArt of War 3:RTS strategy game Image
Stellaris: Galaxy Command ImageStellaris: Galaxy Command ImageStellaris: Galaxy Command Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Battle for the Galaxy is a casual strategy game.

Battle for the Galaxy is available on PC, Web Browser and Windows.

Battle for the Galaxy was released on May 13, 2019.

Battle for the Galaxy was developed by AMT Games.

Battle for the Galaxy has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its humor but disliked it for its graphics.

Battle for the Galaxy is a multiplayer game.

Similar games include War and Magic: Kingdom Reborn, Puzzle Breakers: Champions War, Battle Islands, Art of War 3:RTS strategy game, Stellaris: Galaxy Command and others.