Auto Diggers

About

"Auto Diggers" is an arcade game where the objective is to dig the ground. However, the game is filled with bugs and is frequently interrupted by annoying ads, which can hinder the overall gameplay experience. The game's description "Dig the ground!" accurately summarizes the main objective of the game, but the player should be aware of the game's limitations before downloading.

Genres & Tags

Arcade

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

44%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,051 reviews

graphics3 positive mentions

monetization371 negative mentions

The game has a decent premise and can be a fun time killer.
Gameplay is simple and can be satisfying, providing a mindless distraction.
The graphics and concept are appealing, resembling popular games.

The game is riddled with forced ads, making it feel more like an ad simulator than a game.
It frequently crashes and has significant bugs, leading to lost progress.
Many assets appear to be stolen from Minecraft, raising concerns about originality and legality.

monetization
423 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
1%
88%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized for its excessive and intrusive ad placements, with many players reporting that even after purchasing the "no ads" option, they continue to encounter forced advertisements. Users express frustration over the frequency of ads, which often disrupt gameplay and require a constant internet connection, leading to a perception of the game as a cash grab rather than a genuine gaming experience. Overall, the overwhelming presence of ads significantly detracts from the enjoyment of the game, with many players opting to uninstall due to the ad saturation.
- “Bought the no ads pack because the game was fun but had too many ads, so it sounded like a fair purchase.”
- “No ads so was good to play endlessly.”
- “Plus side no ads.”
- “This game is a cash grab and a scam.”
- “You spend more time in the ads than playing the game.”
- “Forced ads just break your game and you build a game as a waste of money and time.”
gameplay
20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
15%
70%
15%
The gameplay is generally described as fun and simple, featuring elements like digging and merging mechanics, but it suffers from significant repetitiveness and a frustratingly high frequency of ads that disrupt the experience. Many players find the ad-to-gameplay ratio off-putting, leading to a tedious experience despite some enjoyable aspects. Overall, while the mechanics and graphics have potential, the overwhelming presence of ads detracts from the overall enjoyment.
- “Now that I've played a few rounds, I can say this game has a decent premise and gameplay to be a time killer.”
- “There's a fun element of digging and merging, and I had just found some sort of building mechanic.”
- “The mechanics and graphics were good.”
- “As for the gameplay, it's fun but repetitive.”
- “The ratio of ad to gameplay is off which makes this game so tedious to play.”
- “Boring, not much control over gameplay.”
stability
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from significant stability issues, frequently freezing, shutting down, and experiencing glitches, particularly during reward ads and after reaching higher levels. Many users report losing progress due to these bugs, leading to frustration and a diminished gaming experience. While some players find the game enjoyable, the persistent technical problems have caused many to stop playing altogether.
- “But it often freezes, shuts down, and the screen goes black during reward ads or gets you most of the way through the ad then blacks out, freezes, or shuts down.”
- “Game is fun, but even if you progress far in the game, eventually it glitches and you can't beat certain levels because the walls you break through just keep piling up on each other.”
- “Extremely buggy and glitchy mess.”
graphics
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
60%
40%
The graphics of the game are a mixed bag, with some users appreciating the satisfying visuals and mechanics, while others criticize the resemblance to Minecraft's aesthetic, describing it as a "ripoff." Overall, opinions vary, with some finding the graphics enjoyable and fitting for a casual game, while others feel they are too childish.
- “The mechanics and graphics were good.”
- “Otherwise, a nice concept, satisfying graphics, and a new take on time wasters.”
- “The game matches the ads and is quite satisfying despite the simplistic visuals.”
- “I don't like the total Minecraft graphics rip-off.”
- “I wish it didn't have such childish graphics, especially since I spend time around a lot of smart people.”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report significant optimization issues, with frequent app crashes and poor performance persisting even after blocking ads.
- “Even with blocking every ad, the game still suffers from terrible optimization.”
- “The app crashes frequently due to performance issues.”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
150%
The humor in the game is generally perceived as lacking, with users noting that the designs appear unoriginal and the comedic elements fail to elicit genuine laughter. Many feel that the promotional claims of humor are misleading, as the content does not deliver on those expectations.
- “It's fine, but the designs are so obviously stolen it's not funny.”
- “The jokes fall flat and feel forced, lacking any real wit.”
- “I expected more clever humor, but it mostly relies on tired clichés.”
grinding
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious, citing an imbalance between advertisements and gameplay that detracts from the overall experience.
- “The ratio of ads to gameplay is off, which makes this game so tedious to play.”
- “Grinding feels like a never-ending chore rather than an enjoyable part of the game.”
- “The repetitive nature of grinding takes away from the overall experience and makes it feel like a slog.”
story
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The story aspect of the game is criticized for lacking depth, as there are no upgrades or missions to engage with, resulting in a less immersive narrative experience.
- “The story feels incomplete, with no upgrades or missions to engage with.”
- “I found the narrative lacking depth and direction, leaving me unsatisfied.”
- “The plot was predictable and failed to captivate my interest.”
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
The game is criticized for having no replay value, indicating that players do not find incentives to revisit it after completing it.
- “There is no replay value.”
- “Once you've completed the game, there's little incentive to play it again.”
- “The lack of varied outcomes makes replaying feel pointless.”