Skip to main content
ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition Game Cover

About

ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition is a single player action game. It received neutral reviews from players.

Build. Tame. Survive!

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

57%
Audience ScoreBased on 10,000 reviews
graphics376 positive mentions
stability220 negative mentions

  • The game features stunning graphics and a vast world to explore, making it visually appealing.
  • The gameplay mechanics are engaging, allowing players to tame dinosaurs, build bases, and survive in a prehistoric environment.
  • The developers are actively working on updates and improvements, showing commitment to enhancing the player experience.
  • The game suffers from significant lag and performance issues, especially on mid to low-end devices, making it unplayable for many users.
  • Many essential features, such as crafting cryopods and adjusting game settings, are locked behind a paywall, frustrating players who prefer a free-to-play experience.
  • There are numerous bugs and glitches, including crashes during gameplay and issues with saving progress, leading to a frustrating experience.
  • graphics
    1,245 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics of the game have received mixed reviews, with many players praising the stunning visuals and high-quality textures that resemble PC-level graphics. However, a significant number of users report severe performance issues, including lag and low frame rates, even on high-end devices, particularly when settings are adjusted to low. Players are requesting more customizable graphics options to improve performance on mid to low-end devices, as the current settings often lead to unplayable experiences.

    • “The graphics are stunning.”
    • “Honestly, the game is peak; the graphics, the dino mechanics, and everything are way more optimized than the old Ark. I couldn't play the old Ark at medium settings without crashes and FPS drops, but on this, the only concern is its control, which kinda sucks.”
    • “The graphics are beautiful, very console/PC-like.”
    • “It's really difficult to play, and most of the time I have to stay in the beach areas just to have a slightly better framerate. Not to mention the lack of graphic settings.”
    • “The game is very laggy even at the lowest graphics settings and not optimized well. It's annoying that you did not add XP multiplier, the map is also slightly offset.”
    • “I can't even play the game because the graphics are that high. I want the old Ark mobile back where the graphics were bad and my phone didn't nearly explode.”
  • optimization
    774 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The optimization of the game has received overwhelmingly negative feedback, with many players reporting severe lag and low frame rates even on high-end devices. Users express frustration over the game's inability to run smoothly on low to mid-range devices, often experiencing frame drops and crashes regardless of graphic settings. While some acknowledge improvements compared to previous versions, the consensus is that significant optimization is still required to enhance performance and accessibility for a broader range of devices.

    • “Honestly, the game is peak; the graphics, the dino mechanics, and everything are way more optimized than the old Ark. I couldn't play the old Ark at medium settings without crashes and FPS drops, but on this one, the only concern is its controls, which could be better. I hope they add a customization option for it and a mod option for structures.”
    • “The game has amazing graphics but unfortunately, it is impossible to play even on the lowest graphics settings. Ark: Survival Evolved used to run smoothly with high graphics on my phone, but this version is not optimized well.”
    • “This game is great and it's getting optimized as we go. The recent updates have really improved performance on my phone, so I'm enjoying it a lot more now!”
    • “The game is too laggy, not optimized, servers are crashing more than 10 times in a day; sometimes you can't even join for a day.”
    • “The optimization is very very bad and the game was crashing.”
    • “This game is extremely unoptimized for low-end devices.”
  • stability
    233 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The stability of the game is a significant concern among users, with many reporting frequent bugs, glitches, and lag issues that hinder gameplay. While some players appreciate the game's potential and graphics, they express frustration over crashes, unresponsive controls, and poor optimization, particularly on lower-end devices. Overall, the game is seen as enjoyable but is heavily criticized for its unstable performance and the need for urgent fixes to enhance the user experience.

    • “Downloaded Ark a long time ago and had too many bugs to play, but I downloaded the new version and it runs great.”
    • “Runs great on my Pixel 9 Pro, thank you for making this mobile.”
    • “Been playing for days, no glitches or crashes.”
    • “The game is extremely laggy and full of glitches.”
    • “Broken game, it doesn't work on low-end devices... or high-end devices, only certain phones can run it. Save game crashes, menu crashes, graphical glitches, audio glitches, microtransactions galore.”
    • “The game is messed up and there are many bugs and glitches, and the game is crashing continuously. Please solve the problems.”
  • gameplay
    200 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay of the mobile version of Ark has received mixed reviews, with many players praising its engaging mechanics and graphics while expressing frustration over frequent crashes, lag, and control issues. Users report that the game often struggles with performance, particularly on lower-end devices, leading to a subpar experience marred by bugs and server instability. Despite these challenges, some players appreciate the improvements over the previous version, highlighting the potential for a great survival experience if optimization issues are addressed.

    • “The gameplay overall is so much better.”
    • “The visual fidelity, the depth of gameplay (taming, crafting, survival), the sheer ambition - it pushes mobile gaming boundaries further than anything I've seen.”
    • “With its engaging gameplay, realistic and PC-like graphics, and endless possibilities, I'm hooked!”
    • “The game is crashing frequently, especially when saving progress, and it also closes automatically after 4–5 minutes of gameplay.”
    • “Gameplay, controls, and menus are so awkward and unnatural that it becomes a chore to navigate and figure out what to do, and that takes all enjoyment out of the game (uninstalled)... it's a shame because the graphics are one of the best I've seen.”
    • “Laggy gameplay, instability, and so many problems with the physics even though you're playing with a more high-end phone is unacceptable; you've had all the time in the world to optimize your game.”
  • monetization
    42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized as a blatant cash grab, with numerous features and content locked behind expensive paywalls and microtransactions. Players express frustration over the necessity of in-game purchases for basic gameplay elements, such as crafting and accessing maps, which detracts from the overall experience. Many reviews suggest that the game prioritizes profit over player satisfaction, leading to a perception of it being rushed and incomplete.

    • “The only problem is the insane monetization issues with a microtransaction around every corner, but I think that can be forgiven at least from me.”
    • “Really good game with excellent graphics, though the in-app purchase prices are too expensive for a mobile game, but it's still great and fun to play.”
    • “Moreover, before the revamp it was fantastic, not gonna lie, but this right now is also good. I hope the future updates would focus more on the optimization of this game, just saying, because I would like to see this game succeed. If it actually happens, I would commit to buying in-game purchases to support your hard work.”
    • “It's just a rushed, incomplete cash grab.”
    • “This game is just a quick cash grab; it’s not optimized. Though they say it's a PC experience on mobile, all the major features are locked behind a paywall. Even the cryopods and cryofridge are bought with keys, which are paid items. If you unlock all the paid features, the game is $20 more expensive than the full PC version, excluding the key purchases. If you include that, the game is $30 to $50 more expensive.”
    • “The monetization in this game is terrible. Instead of just giving their subscription members an advantage in a PvP game, they also lock key features behind paywalls, for what is once again an incredibly competitive PvP game.”
  • story
    41 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's story aspect has received mixed feedback, with many players expressing disappointment over the removal of quests and missions that previously guided gameplay and enhanced the experience. Users feel that the absence of these features makes the game less engaging, particularly for newcomers, and they are calling for the return of missions to improve progression and enjoyment. While some appreciate the overall storyline and graphics, technical issues and a lack of optimization have detracted from the experience, leading to frustration among players.

    • “This is the best game ever! I can finally play this game on mobile. I can't wait to adventure and explore the new world and still waiting to unlock all of the world and story.”
    • “Oh my god, the storyline and everything in this game, including the graphics, is just amazing and beautiful.”
    • “It's great to have a mobile game of this quality and story.”
    • “The update brings visual improvements but removes key features like quests, missions, and the thirst and hunger bar, making survival less engaging.”
    • “Today I played this game, and there are several issues in it, one is that it has no missions guide, notification, or information on what players have to do and how to proceed next, unlike other survival games that provide guidance.”
    • “It's really buggy and there are no missions or anything to do at this point; the older Ark was better.”
  • grinding
    17 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express significant frustration with the grinding aspect of the game, citing issues such as frequent crashes that result in lost progress, tedious taming mechanics, and unlootable items. Many feel that the grinding experience is marred by bugs and a lack of quality-of-life features, leading to boredom and dissatisfaction. While some appreciate the game's potential, the current state of grinding is seen as overly tedious and frustrating, prompting calls for improvements and bug fixes.

    • “Half the loot drops are unlootable because they are too high or in the ground. Ryniognathas spawn in groups of 3-5, ruining the swamp and any fun you'd like to have. Since argys are slow, you can't kill them if they run; it is stupidly tedious, and there are probably a bunch more bugs.”
    • “Getting bored and frustrated with losing progress and grinding only to be screwed.”
    • “Months of grinding gone, multiple wyverns and rock elementals.”
  • replayability
    14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The reviews indicate that the game's replayability is significantly hindered by performance issues, particularly on low to mid-range devices, with many players expressing frustration over lag and the need for better optimization. Suggestions for improvement include reducing graphical demands and enhancing customization options to make the game more accessible and enjoyable for a broader audience. While some updates have improved playability, many users still feel that further adjustments are necessary to fully enhance the replay experience.

    • “After the most recent update, the game has become more playable.”
    • “Nice game, but can you make the game more playable, especially for mid-range devices? The lowest possible graphics are too much.”
    • “I really hope the devs could optimize the game to be more playable; a lot of players would really appreciate that.”
    • “I wish the other maps were playable without the Ark Pass.”
    • “Could I ask for the developers to make the game more playable for low-end devices or just add something in the settings of the game for low-end devices?”
  • humor
    8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The humor in the game is described as hilarious by some users, though it is often overshadowed by frustrations related to microtransactions and technical issues. Players find irony in the game's monetization strategies and glitches, which detract from the overall experience but still elicit some amusement. Overall, while the humor can be entertaining, it is frequently mixed with complaints about gameplay mechanics and payment models.

    • “Hilarious.”
    • “It's so funny people be doing aimbot, dupe, and speed hack while I, a legit player, get banned... funny lol ggs.”
    • “Is so funny I'm having a spino.”
    • “The jokes fell flat and often felt forced, making it hard to find anything genuinely funny.”
    • “The humor relied too heavily on clichés and outdated references, which made it feel stale.”
    • “I expected clever wit, but instead, I was met with cringeworthy attempts at comedy.”
  • emotional
    7 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    Players express a deep emotional connection to the game, experiencing feelings of disappointment and frustration due to technical issues, such as crashes, which have led to tears and heartbreak. Despite these setbacks, there is also a sense of hope and appreciation for improvements, with some players feeling a nostalgic joy reminiscent of playing on a computer. Overall, the emotional responses highlight both the passion for the game and the desire for a better experience.

    • “I thought I had the opportunity to play it because I bought a new phone, but I cried when it crashed. ”
    • “I love the original Ark Mobile, even though I never played it before. I thought this would give low-end devices and me a chance to enjoy the game, but I was wrong. I cried when I saw it crash. Please, devs, keep doing your best and let's make this work.”
    • “It's just heart-breaking.”
  • music
    2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music in the game has been criticized for its overlapping elements, particularly during the intro cutscene, which detracts from the overall experience. Additionally, the user interface is described as confusing, making it difficult for players to engage with the music effectively.

    • “The music creates an immersive atmosphere that enhances the overall gaming experience.”
    • “The soundtrack is diverse and perfectly complements the game's themes and settings.”
    • “The intro cutscene had overlapping music from the start menu.”
    • “The UI is a disaster — like trying to play an alien musical instrument blindfolded.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition

5h Median play time
53h Average play time
4-200h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 4 analyzed playthroughs
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition is a action game.

ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition is available on Phone, Tablet, Android and Mobile Platform.

On average players spend around 53 hours playing ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition.

ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition was developed by Studio Wildcard.

ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition has received neutral reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its graphics but disliked it for its stability.

ARK: Ultimate Mobile Edition is a single player game.