Arena: Blood on the Sand VR

About

Arena: Blood on the Sand VR is a single player simulation game. It was developed by Random Bird Studio and was released on January 10, 2017. It received neutral reviews from players.

"Arena: Blood on the Sand VR" is a cinematic space shooter set in a cursed empire, where you play as a rising star of the mystical arena. As a gladiator, protect yourself against hordes of bloodthirsty monsters using a sword and shield, and evade from shooting attacks. Make your way to perfection, defeat epic monsters, and conquer all hordes of the evil dark emperor. * Characteristic words / phrases: cinematic space shooter, cursed empire, mystical arena, bloodthirsty monsters, sword and shield, gladiator, epic monsters, evil dark emperor. * Length: 150 characters.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

46%

Audience ScoreBased on 41 reviews

story1 positive mentions

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game provided a sense of joy and hope during a difficult time, helping the player to cope with personal struggles.
It can serve as a fitness game, allowing players to engage in physical activity while playing.
Despite its flaws, some players found it fun and worth trying, especially given the limited VR library.

The game suffers from poor mechanics, with combat being overly simplistic and lacking depth.
There are numerous bugs and issues, including problems with enemy interactions and missing sound effects.
The graphics and overall quality are subpar, leading many to label it as an unfinished or 'asset flip' game.

gameplay
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
62%
38%
The gameplay has been criticized for its lack of depth, with users noting that it primarily involves simplistic sword-wagging and lacks additional combat mechanics. Comparisons to Wii Sports highlight its dated and unrefined mechanics, suggesting that while a minimalist approach could work, the execution falls short of being enjoyable.
- “The gameplay is bad; you just wiggle your sword around.”
- “Gameplay is like Wii Sports 2006.”
- “Could be a fair style for a game, but the mechanics should at least be decent.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game has received mixed feedback, with some players finding it relaxing and soothing, while others expressed dissatisfaction with it. Overall, it seems to evoke a sense of calm for some, but not all players appreciate its style.
- “I relaxed for 5 minutes listening to this music, long enough to realize that I would be okay.”
- “I didn't like the music.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization practices of Droid Riot/Random Bird Studio have been heavily criticized for being exploitative and unethical, as they allegedly use uncredited assets from other creators, leading to accusations of plagiarism and labeling their games as cash grabs. This pattern of behavior raises concerns about the integrity of their offerings on platforms like Steam.
- “The developers didn't credit any of the artists and real game developers who created the assets, so this is plagiarism, as well as a cash grab.”
- “Droid Riot/Random Bird Studio have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab through this account or closely linked/alt accounts.”
- “This game feels like a blatant cash grab, lacking originality and respect for the original creators.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story emphasizes resilience and the unpredictability of life, highlighting that perseverance in the face of adversity can lead to unexpected and rewarding outcomes.
- “The moral of the story is that you never know what life has in store for you. If I had given up when all odds were against me, I wouldn't be where I am today.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players generally view grinding positively, particularly for game farming, as it allows for resource accumulation and character progression. This aspect is often seen as a rewarding experience for those who enjoy repetitive tasks to enhance their gameplay.
graphics
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
The graphics in the game have been consistently criticized for being poor and low quality, lacking the detail and design expected by players.
- “The graphics are poor and of low quality, lacking any real design appeal.”
- “The visuals are disappointing, with low-quality graphics that detract from the overall experience.”
- “The game's graphics are subpar, featuring low-quality design that fails to impress.”