Another Try 2

About

Another Try 2 is a single player and multiplayer survival action adventure game with a post-apocalyptic theme. It was developed by Hoki Wolf Studio and was released on April 17, 2025. It received negative reviews from players.

To survive at any cost is the only goal. To do this, you will have to overcome difficulties such as cold, thirst and hunger. Make a fire, build a shelter, kill animals and explore abandoned cities. Protect yourself from infected and other players. Do whatever it takes to survive. Current features: Open World Zombie Survival Game. Travel through a devastated post apocalyptic world. …

Skip User Reviews

36%

Audience ScoreBased on 148 reviews

graphics7 positive mentions

stability9 negative mentions

The game has a unique art style and atmosphere that many players find visually appealing.
There is potential in the core gameplay concept and mechanics, which some players are hopeful will be improved with future updates.
Multiplayer mode is functional and can be fun with friends, especially as the game develops further.

The game world is largely empty with many buildings inaccessible or devoid of loot, making exploration unrewarding and repetitive.
Survival mechanics like temperature management are overly punishing and sometimes inconsistent, leading to frustration and early deaths.
Numerous bugs, glitches, and poor AI detract from gameplay, including issues with enemy behavior, item handling, freezing, and UI problems.

gameplay
25 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
12%
76%
12%
The gameplay is criticized for having a small or empty map, repetitive and shallow mechanics, and an ill-defined core loop that mixes realistic and unrealistic elements inconsistently. Survival features are minimal or absent, with lack of basic mechanics like food, water, and meaningful crafting, leading to immersion breaking and limited engagement despite detailed visuals and added vehicle/building mechanics. Overall, the gameplay feels unfinished, unbalanced, and failing to deliver a compelling or coherent experience.
- “The only reason I would recommend this game is the detail and gameplay.”
- “The game is very nice; it has a big map with a ton of items and mechanics to explore.”
- “I was extremely surprised to see that the latest updates included such things as new vehicles/car-related mechanics or other things like building mechanics.”
- “The map is very small and most of it feels empty, which makes the gameplay repetitive after some time.”
- “The tutorial is subpar at best and barely teaches you any of the basic mechanics.”
- “What is the point of each craft realistically taking time like in 'zomboid/mist survival' if the overall crafting system is a bunch of brainless upgrades that feel totally unrealistic and break your immersion (e.g., crafting AKs with duct tape and scrap metal using a wooden table as an instrument, or crafting a kevlar vest with leather and thread and needle)? In simpler terms, the crafting loop is both realistic and absolutely unrealistic and immersion-breaking at the same time, which makes the realistic elements feel like a nuisance instead of a believable gameplay mechanic.”
story
21 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
14%
72%
14%
The game's story is widely criticized for its lack of depth, with very few quests, minimal main story content, and repetitive or vague objectives. Many players find the missions short, uninspired, and poorly integrated in multiplayer, leading to a largely empty and unengaging experience. While the setting shows potential, the absence of meaningful narrative development and limited quest variety significantly undermine the story aspect.
- “There was a lot of things that are not explained in the quests or how to complete them, but the game is pretty good considering the price with some bugs that hopefully will be fixed in the future.”
- “Has potential to become a very fun to play game with more quests and game additions.”
- “It started giving the story of what happened.”
- “The game is very short, with no main story and no additional content being added.”
- “Progression breaks after the first two missions, and all NPCs repeat the same dialogue with no mission continuation.”
- “Quests aren't very detailed and are vague; in multiplayer, not all quests are linked to all players, so each player may have to redo them, which is frustrating.”
stability
9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game suffers from numerous stability issues, including frequent glitches such as black screens indoors at dusk, walking glitches that prevent entering rooms, and vehicles getting stuck randomly. These bugs significantly impact the gameplay experience.
- “Glitches are outrageous.. the screen will go completely black if you find yourself indoors at dusk.”
- “Half of the rooms that are inside the buildings you can't get into due to walking glitches.. you just hover.”
- “You find a car and it randomly glitches and gets stuck.”
graphics
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
88%
12%
The game's graphics are generally praised for their impressive art style, design, and optimization, with no lag issues reported. While the visuals and surroundings are appreciated, some users desire more character variety and player additions. Overall, the graphics are considered beautiful and fitting to the game's concept, though some find the experience a bit limited beyond the aesthetics.
- “Graphics, sounds, and interface are very impressive.”
- “Amazing graphics and optimization, no lags.”
- “I really enjoy the art style and concept of the game.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features significant grinding, often described as mindless and repetitive, primarily focused on base-building with limited immediate rewards. While some players find the grind enjoyable and engaging, others see it as a tedious necessity. Multiplayer elements and certain fun mechanics somewhat offset the monotony.
- “This is a very grindy game.”
- “Nothing to do except mindless grinding to build a base to do... nothing I guess?”
- “Pros: fun, multiplayer, a little bit of grinding, losing track of time, rat silencer”
humor
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The humor in the game is widely criticized as unfunny and boring, with some players only finding amusement in how poorly executed it is. Overall, the comedic aspect seems poorly developed and falls flat.
monetization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization is heavily criticized as a blatant cash grab, with users feeling misled by aggressive advertising and disappointing in-game value.
- “This is a cash grab by incompetent developers who should be ashamed.”
- “Sadly, I fell for the trap of the developers buying advertising from TikTok creators to make it seem like this game was better than it actually is.”
emotional
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The emotional aspect highlights a sense of challenge and immersion, as players must carefully navigate close to the fire's edge to gain warmth, enhancing tension and realism.
replayability
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game initially provides an engaging experience but quickly loses its appeal, resulting in limited replay value.
- “While it starts off strong, it loses its appeal fast and doesn’t offer much replay value.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game features impressive graphics paired with excellent optimization, resulting in smooth performance without any lag.
- “Amazing graphics and optimization with no lags.”