Animals Memory: Cats

About

"Animals Memory: Cats" is a memory-based card game featuring pictures of various cats. The objective is to find matching card pairs in increasingly difficult levels. With 49 feline-themed cards and 18 levels, this game aims to improve memory skills for players of all ages.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

84%

Audience ScoreBased on 86 reviews

replayability3 positive mentions

graphics3 negative mentions

Cute cat pictures that appeal to animal lovers.
Easy to achieve 100% completion by replaying the first level.
Suitable for children and casual gamers looking for a simple memory challenge.

Very limited content with only 18 levels that can be completed in under half an hour.
Lacks depth and challenge, making it feel more like a mobile app than a PC game.
The price is considered too high for the amount of content offered, especially given the game's simplistic nature.

graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
58%
25%
The game's graphics are described as unimpressive, featuring simple 2D visuals typical of low-effort mobile apps, which fall short of the quality expected from PC games. Reviewers note a lack of skill and budget in the development, resulting in a visually underwhelming experience that does not leverage the capabilities of modern graphics technology. Overall, the graphics do not contribute positively to the game's appeal.
- “The game features simple 2D graphics, of the type you normally expect to see in low-effort mobile apps.”
- “Considering this is being evaluated as a PC game, having the graphics phoned in like this isn't going to result in a high quality, visually impressive game that PC gamers are used to seeing.”
- “3D graphics programming does require a degree of skill and competence, and unfortunately not all developers have the budget or talent to deliver this, despite 3D graphics cards hitting the mainstream in the 1990s.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The monetization practices of Laush Dmitriy Sergeevich and Laush Studio have been criticized for being unethical, involving the exploitation of others' work and the use of fake accounts to promote low-quality asset flips as cash grabs. Reviews indicate a pattern of coordinated activity, including the posting of misleading reviews shortly after game launches, primarily in broken English or Russian.
- “Laush Dmitriy Sergeevich/Laush Studio have shown a repeat pattern of unethically dumping other people's work onto Steam as a cheap, nasty cash grab, through this account or through closely linked/alt accounts.”
- “They're all written in either Russian or broken English, appear at almost exactly the same time, very shortly after the game launched on Steam, all have a direct Steam purchase of the game, and the accounts are used consistently to write fake reviews for asset flips and other cash grabs/scams.”
music
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
25%
50%
The music in the game receives mixed reviews, with some players finding it catchy and enjoyable, while others criticize it as awful, indicating a divide in player opinions on its quality.
- “The music is quite catchy and really enhances the overall experience.”
- “The game itself worked well and was very smooth, but the music was awful.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is criticized for lacking any narrative depth, with reviewers noting that it has no story to engage players, and it can be completed in just half an hour.
- “It doesn't offer anything impressive in the graphical or audio department, has no story at all and takes only half an hour to complete.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews suggest that the grinding aspect of the game appeals primarily to those who enjoy repetitive tasks or have a strong affinity for cats, but it may not be engaging enough for players seeking more dynamic gameplay.
- “I'd say buy it if you are into perfect game grinding or just like cats and are really bored.”
replayability
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
150%
50%
Replayability is primarily driven by the presence of 1-3 star challenges that encourage players to revisit the game for completion. However, the overall consensus suggests that replay value may be limited beyond these challenges.
- “Replayability exists with 1-3 star challenges for completion.”
- “The game offers a variety of challenges that encourage replayability.”
- “Each playthrough can feel different due to the diverse challenges available.”
- “Replayability exists as far as 1-3 star challenges for completion.”