Animal Racing

About

Animal Racing is a single player casual racing game. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

Animal Racing is a single-player racing game where you recruit a variety of animals to compete in exciting sprint races. Strive to become the Animal King by mastering different tracks and animals. However, gameplay is frequently interrupted by too many ads, which can affect the overall experience.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

79%

Audience ScoreBased on 1,192 reviews

humor5 positive mentions

monetization144 negative mentions

The game is fun and entertaining, making it a great option for passing time.
It features a variety of animals and engaging gameplay elements like racing and zoo building.
Many players appreciate the game's ability to keep children entertained and teach them about managing resources.

The game is plagued by excessive ads, often interrupting gameplay every few seconds.
Players have reported issues with game mechanics, such as hiring employees and upgrading features not functioning properly.
The overall experience is diminished by the frequent ads, leading to frustration and a desire to uninstall the game.

monetization
147 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
2%
98%
The monetization strategy of the game has been heavily criticized for its excessive and disruptive ad placements, with players reporting ads every 15-30 seconds and requiring lengthy ad views to unlock features. While some users acknowledge the need for ads to generate revenue, many feel that the frequency and duration of ads detract significantly from the gameplay experience, leading to frustration and even uninstallation of the game. Overall, the consensus is that the game prioritizes ad revenue over player enjoyment, making it less appealing to many users.
- “It is a very interesting game; no ads if you want a reward, only then you will watch an ad. ”
- “I like this game; no ads.”
- “The game is fun but the ads are excessive and disruptive.”
- “Too many ads every minute; there's an advertisement that takes 5-30 seconds to finish. It's not a game anymore; it's more about watching ads than playing.”
- “The game deserves 5 stars, but I only gave 3 because of the overwhelming advertisements.”
humor
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players consistently highlight the game's humor as a standout feature, describing it as one of the funniest they've encountered. While some mention the presence of ads, the overall sentiment is that the game's comedic elements provide significant entertainment value.
- “This game is very funny and entertaining.”
- “Funny game but ads.”
- “Funny ”
graphics
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
25%
Overall, the graphics received mixed feedback; while some users praised them as "good" and "nice," others felt they fell short of expectations, leading to a slight reduction in ratings.
- “The graphics are very nice and enhance the overall experience.”
- “Good graphics and entertaining gameplay!”
- “A good game with impressive graphics!”
- “This is very good, but the graphics are not that great; that's why I removed one star.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users report significant stability issues, with many experiencing numerous glitches that hinder gameplay. Initial impressions indicate a frustrating experience due to these technical problems.
- “At first, I was not having a good time at all; there were so many glitches I couldn't stand it, so I sat down.”
- “The game crashes frequently, making it nearly unplayable.”
- “I experienced constant lag and freezing, which ruined the overall experience.”
music
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The music in the game is generally well-received, contributing to a cheerful atmosphere with happy animal themes; however, some users express a desire for an option to turn off the music and sound.
- “Happy animals and nice music game”
- “It would have been better if there was an option to turn off the music and sound.”
story
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
50%
50%
The story aspect of the game has received mixed reviews, with some players feeling disappointed by the focus on zoo management and building mechanics rather than the promised excitement of animal races, which are relegated to side missions. While the premise of being a visionary zoo manager is intriguing, it may not appeal to those who prefer a more narrative-driven experience.
- “2.5 stars, not as good as I hoped. 90% of the game is you having to build and run a zoo. Animal races are just side missions, which completely sucks. I don't want to be forced to build and preside over a whole economy, dude. I don't even like building games.”
gameplay
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The gameplay is criticized for being primarily a city-building experience overshadowed by excessive advertisements, with mini-games that are not representative of the overall gameplay. Users feel misled by promotional content, leading to disappointment in the actual game mechanics.
- “Another stupid city-building game masked with false ads and fun short mini-games that are not even 5% of the whole gameplay.”
- “Mostly ads, little gameplay.”