AirTycoon Online 3

About

AirTycoon Online 3 is a single player casual role playing game. It was developed by TRADEGAME Lab Inc. and was released on December 21, 2017. It received mostly positive reviews from players.

"AirTycoon Online 3 is a turn-based airline management simulation game with 3D graphics, where players compete with others to become the top airline. The game features over 170 real airplane models, detailed management reports, and new hub concepts for strategic growth. Communicate with players worldwide, form alliances, and manage 500 airports for realistic and engaging gameplay."

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player

Skip User Reviews

64%

Audience ScoreBased on 317 reviews

gameplay3 negative mentions

The game features improved graphics and a more challenging gameplay experience compared to its predecessor, ATO2.
The hub system adds a strategic layer to the game, encouraging players to think critically about route management.
Many players find the game addictive and enjoy the competitive aspect of managing their airlines.

The hub system is overly restrictive, making it difficult for players to establish routes and compete effectively.
Many players report that making a profit is nearly impossible without spending real money, leading to frustration.
The game suffers from long waiting times for actions and a confusing interface, which detracts from the overall experience.

graphics
14 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
21%
58%
21%
The graphics in the latest installment have received praise for their significant improvement over the previous version, with many users highlighting the enhanced quality of airports and aircraft. However, some players express disappointment over the lack of certain realistic features, such as airline logos on planes and a more dynamic representation of flight routes. Overall, while the graphics are a strong point, there are calls for further enhancements and additional content.
- “So I was quite excited initially when I saw the third installment, and the pictures of the graphics amazed me.”
- “The game is good and the graphics, airplanes, and airports look very impressive. I am very happy playing it.”
- “While the graphics are a step up, it is better than the previous version, with awesome colors, especially at night.”
- “Graphics are definitely way better than its predecessor, but the interface needs improvement.”
- “Very improved graphics of airports, but the icons of aircraft in the store should be more appealing, like in ATO2.”
- “It's like ATO2, nothing new, only the graphics; I'm not a fan of this.”
gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
17%
33%
50%
The gameplay is generally perceived as challenging and slow, with some players finding it excessively difficult and frustrating, particularly due to long wait times for short play sessions. While the controls and functionality are appreciated, the overall experience lacks engagement, contributing to a limited player base.
- “The gameplay is very tough; please make it a bit easier, but still, it's a nice game.”
- “The gameplay is very tough; please make it a bit easier. Still, it's a nice game.”
- “I really like the functionality of this game and controls, but the lack of attention-grabbing gameplay is probably why there are a lot of channels with only 120 or so players.”
- “Slow gameplay.”
monetization
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
75%
75%
Players express frustration with the monetization model, citing issues such as the creation of multiple accounts to manipulate in-game economics and the necessity of in-app purchases to progress. Many feel that the system is unfairly designed, making it difficult to succeed without spending real money.
- “I have spent 7 weeks playing the game, and I appreciate the balance of in-game purchases.”
- “The monetization model allows for a fair experience without forcing players to spend money.”
- “I enjoy that I can earn rewards through gameplay, even though there are in-app purchases available.”
- “I hate how people create multiple accounts, raise advertisement expenses in all cities, decrease the value of the company, and then buy a 30-plane company for 100k using their main account.”
- “I lost money on in-game purchases and 7 weeks of gameplay.”
- “Having in-app purchase issues is not acceptable.”
music
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Reviews on the music aspect are mixed, with some users expressing dissatisfaction by describing the music as "bad," while others praise the background tracks as "awesome." This indicates a polarized reception, highlighting a divide in player preferences regarding the game's soundtrack.
- “The background music is awesome!”
- “The soundtrack perfectly complements the gameplay, enhancing the overall experience.”
- “I love how the music evolves with the game, creating an immersive atmosphere.”
- “The music is really disappointing and doesn't fit the game's atmosphere.”
- “I found the soundtrack to be repetitive and uninspired.”
- “The audio quality of the music is poor, making it hard to enjoy.”
stability
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Users note that while the game is overall excellent, there are concerns regarding stability due to graphical issues and glitches that need to be addressed for a smoother experience.
- “The game has a lot of potential, but frequent crashes make it frustrating to play.”
- “I love the concept, but the constant bugs and glitches ruin the experience.”
- “Stability is a major issue; I often find myself getting kicked out of matches unexpectedly.”