Age of Evolution

About

"Age of Evolution" is a thrilling journey through time, challenging players to lead a species from the past to the future. Start as a simple organism, evolve and adapt to survive, and guide your creation through milestones of evolution. With strategic decision-making and engaging gameplay, "Age of Evolution" brings prehistoric life to the palm of your hand, allowing you to "travel back and lead forward" in a race against time and extinction.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo

75%

Audience ScoreBased on 325 reviews

graphics10 positive mentions

stability6 negative mentions

The game has a lot of potential and offers enjoyable gameplay with a good community.
Graphics and artwork are well-received, contributing to an overall positive experience.
The game features a variety of mini-games and activities that keep players engaged.

The game is plagued by numerous bugs and technical issues, leading to frustrating gameplay experiences.
There is a strong pay-to-win aspect, making it difficult for free-to-play players to compete effectively.
Customer support is lacking, with many players feeling ignored and dissatisfied with the developers' responsiveness.

graphics
16 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
63%
19%
19%
Overall, the graphics of the game receive a mixed reception from users. While many praise the visuals as "good" or "impressive," some criticize them as "poor" or "plain," indicating inconsistency in quality. Additionally, there are calls for optimization on high-end devices and improvements to certain graphical elements, suggesting that while the graphics are generally appreciated, there is room for enhancement.
- “The gameplay, campaign, and graphics are phenomenal.”
- “I'm really enjoying the game, great gameplay and visuals too.”
- “Very impressive..love the graphic..game play”
- “One of the simple but great games I have, but please fix the bug when I can't see enemies. It reduces my gaming experience. And one more thing, change the animal graphics or the animal system; it's cringe, to be honest.”
- “You should optimize the graphics for high-end devices like mine.”
- “Same boring SLG, graphics are poor, minimal content, but gameplay is smooth and rewards are abundant.”
story
15 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
33%
47%
20%
The game's story is generally well-received, featuring engaging elements like resource hunting, exploration, and interactions with gods, complemented by voice-overs and appealing graphics. However, players express frustration with repetitive missions, bugs, and a shift towards a pay-to-play model, which detracts from the overall experience. While the narrative has potential, it suffers from execution issues and a lack of rewarding gameplay.
- “Good story, have their own gameplay mechanisms, the artwork is fine.”
- “Balanced - good story with actual voice-overs.”
- “Nice and interesting game with good graphics and interesting story, but bad programming!”
- “I had played this same story in another game before, what is that?”
- “Same story, get resources, wait for construction to be finalized, and so on and so forth.”
- “Storyline is kind of cringe and the game follows the classic endless tutorial recipe.”
stability
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is generally considered to be quite buggy, with frequent issues causing restarts during missions and gameplay interruptions. While some players see potential and enjoy the experience, the persistent bugs and increasing difficulty without spending money have led to frustration and disappointment among users.
- “Excellent game, but very buggy with certain parts you pass and then it restarts for no reason, especially during intel missions and technology updates. Just about to win, and it restarts, making the other side much harder. It's getting worse, not better. Also, it feels forced to pay to play as time goes on, which is disappointing. Now it's totally pay to play; they keep making it harder unless you spend money. Not worth it anymore!”
- “The game is still a bit buggy in places (like the skills in battle especially), but it definitely has a lot of potential, and I have a fun time playing it.”
- “Good game, but very buggy. I hate it.”
gameplay
6 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
83%
50%
Overall, the gameplay is praised for its smooth mechanics and enjoyable experience, with many users highlighting its engaging campaign and visuals. While some critiques mention minimal content and poor graphics, the majority find the gameplay rewarding and easy to master, appealing to a wide range of players.
- “The gameplay, campaign, and graphics are phenomenal.”
- “I'm really enjoying the game, great gameplay and visuals too.”
- “Very good gameplay and easy to master.”
- “The gameplay feels clunky and unresponsive, making it frustrating to enjoy.”
- “I found the mechanics to be overly complicated and not intuitive at all.”
- “The pacing of the gameplay is inconsistent, leading to a disjointed experience.”
grinding
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game to be tedious and time-consuming, often feeling that extensive effort yields minimal rewards. While the game's technical performance and graphics are praised, the repetitive nature of grinding can detract from the overall experience.
- “Technically the game is a beast and works beautifully, but trying to follow it makes it tedious.”
- “You can be on 24 hours a day grinding, and it changes nothing.”
monetization
3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Reviews indicate that players are frustrated with the monetization model, citing excessively long build times that feel like a cash grab for time skips. Additionally, there are complaints about misleading advertisements that do not accurately represent the game.
- “I would rather not wait months to get back items lost from being attacked, and the build times get ridiculously long to the point it just starts to seem like a cash grab for time skips.”
- “I am tired of fake ads.”
- “The ads have nothing to do with the actual game.”
optimization
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
300%
300%
Users express a strong desire for improved optimization in the game, indicating that current performance issues detract from their overall experience. Many believe that with better optimization, the game could easily achieve a higher rating.
- “The optimizations in the game have significantly improved my overall experience, making it smoother and more enjoyable.”
- “I appreciate the continuous updates focused on optimization; they really enhance gameplay and performance.”
- “The recent optimization patches have made a noticeable difference, allowing for a more seamless and engaging experience.”
- “Fix the optimizations in the game as fast as possible. I would give this 5 stars, but it needs more improvement.”
- “The game runs poorly on my system despite meeting the recommended requirements. Optimization is severely lacking.”
- “I experience frequent frame drops and stuttering, which makes the gameplay frustrating. The optimization needs a lot of work.”
humor
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
Players find the game to be both enjoyable and humorous, highlighting its comedic elements as a significant strength.
- “This game is very good and very funny.”