Skip to main content
Age Breakers Game Cover

About

Age Breakers is a single player platformer game. It received negative reviews from players.

Age Breakers is a single-player platformer challenging players to "Break Through Time!" with engaging mechanics and time-based puzzles. While the gameplay offers a rewarding grind, it is hindered by frequent advertisements and numerous bugs that affect the overall experience. Fans of platformers seeking a time-themed challenge may find it intriguing despite its flaws.

Genres & Tags
Play Modes
Skip User Reviews

37%
Audience ScoreBased on 940 reviews
gameplay11 positive mentions
monetization187 negative mentions

  • The gameplay is fun and engaging, providing a steady progression that keeps players interested.
  • The game has a unique concept and offers a variety of challenges that can be enjoyable.
  • The graphics and art style are appealing, making the game visually interesting.
  • The energy system is overly restrictive, requiring players to wait an hour for just one energy point, which severely limits gameplay.
  • The game is plagued by numerous bugs, including crashes, glitches in events, and issues with progression.
  • Forced ads appear after every level, which detracts from the overall experience and can be frustrating for players.
  • monetization
    211 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The monetization strategy of the game has drawn significant criticism, primarily due to the overwhelming presence of forced ads after nearly every gameplay attempt, which detracts from the overall experience. Players express frustration over the slow energy recharge system, which limits playtime and encourages in-game purchases to progress, leading many to label it a cash grab. Despite some initial enjoyment, the aggressive monetization tactics, including mandatory ads and ineffective reward systems, have prompted numerous users to recommend against downloading the game.

    • “If the energy system was removed, this game would be 5/5 because all other microtransactions are voluntary upgrades and quality of life improvements.”
    • “I like the game, steady progress keeps me wanting to play... so naturally I attempted to purchase energy to keep playing, the purchase showed up on my card, but not in game... I just wasted two bucks for nothing... I don't recommend making in-app purchases... but, for what it is, the game is fun.”
    • “Best game ever, no ads.”
    • “Not a bad game at first but then they hit you with forced ads after every single attempt and you get 10 energy then have to wait an hour to get more unless you pay.”
    • “Don't waste your time on this game; it has an energy system with a low amount of time to play. The game loop is extremely short, the main gameplay is grinding, but it doesn't even want you to play. It has ads to restore energy but only restores 2, and only 2 ads can play per day, so only 4 free energy; the rest you have to wait or pay money, all just to play repeated gameplay.”
    • “The time you have to wait for energy is ridiculous, having to wait 20 minutes or longer for 1 energy. The only other way you can get energy is by watching ads or paying for them.”
  • stability
    56 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game's stability is heavily criticized, with numerous reports of freezing, glitches, and bugs that significantly hinder gameplay. Players experience frequent crashes, graphical issues, and loss of progress, particularly in later levels and during specific events. Despite some updates attempting to address these problems, many users feel that the game remains unplayable and poorly supported.

    • “This game already had many bugs, drops, glitches, but this... it's over.”
    • “Game cannot handle the amount going on if you have explosive shotbam at a higher level and just freezes!”
    • “Game doesn't even work, I've loaded up a few times and each time it loads up the game freezes or slows down to the point it stops; it's unplayable.”
  • gameplay
    43 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The gameplay is generally described as enjoyable and engaging, but it is severely hampered by a restrictive energy system that limits playtime and encourages microtransactions. Players report a repetitive experience with frequent ads and various bugs that disrupt the flow, leading to frustration despite the core mechanics being fun. Overall, while the gameplay has potential, the monetization strategy and technical issues detract significantly from the experience.

    • “Great gameplay even though it's repetitive.”
    • “Gameplay is simple, yet enjoyable.”
    • “This game has one of those gameplay loops that's always engaging.”
    • “Don't waste your time on this game; it has an energy system with a low amount of time to play. The game loop is extremely short, the main gameplay is grinding, but it doesn't even want you to play. It has ads to restore energy but only restores 2, and only 2 ads can play per day, so only 4 free energy. The rest you have to wait for or pay money, all just to play repeated gameplay.”
    • “I would be giving this game a 4-star review, but the limited amount of energy you get really takes it down. You only get 1 energy per hour and can only hold a maximum of 10 unless you pay real money for an upgrade. The game is fun, but honestly, the lack of ability to really play ruins it a fair bit. If there was a way to get more energy for free, that would definitely improve the gameplay, or if your energy got filled once per hour instead of only giving you 1 energy, it just feels like this game is a cash grab.”
    • “The energy mechanic is absolutely ridiculous and unnecessary.”
  • graphics
    36 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The graphics in the game are plagued by significant issues, including a non-functional graphics settings menu that prevents players from adjusting quality levels, leading to performance problems on lower-end devices. Users report frequent graphical glitches and lag, particularly during intense gameplay, which detracts from the overall experience. Many players express frustration over the inability to lower graphics settings, suggesting that optimization is urgently needed to enhance playability.

    • “This game is really good, but after you get stronger, it starts to lag and the graphics setting doesn't work; that's my only complaint.”
    • “Mainly the graphic quality selector not working makes the game unplayable when you have a lot of troops and a bunch of graphical bugs as well.”
    • “Need to work on graphics; can't select to low, it lags like hell. The concept is a good, enjoyable game.”
    • “There are graphical glitches in some of the perks and upgrades that get in the way of gameplay.”
    • “Mainly the graphic quality selector not working makes the game unplayable when you have a lot of troops, and a bunch of graphical bugs as well.”
    • “Can't change the graphics to stop the extreme loss of frames; badly tested for bugs.”
  • story
    20 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The story aspect of the game is marred by significant issues with the quest system, including daily resets of quest levels, glitches in quest tracking, and confusion over premium quests that cannot be claimed without purchasing a battle pass. Players express frustration over non-functional quests and the lack of organization in the quest list, which detracts from overall enjoyment and progression. Despite these problems, some users still find enjoyment in the game, indicating potential for improvement.

    • “The one that really annoys me is the seasonal quest levels keep resetting me to 0 but half the quests are done, so I can't really level up.”
    • “Some quests like forge weapons just don't work.”
    • “I found the following season quest related bugs: season points reset daily.”
  • optimization
    12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The game suffers from severe optimization issues, leading to significant frame rate drops and stuttering, especially when multiple effects are in use. Players report being unable to adjust quality settings, resulting in freezing screens and crashes, particularly after progressing beyond the initial levels. Overall, the performance is described as poor, with high resource consumption and a need for urgent optimization improvements.

    • “It needs to be optimized further for smooth gameplay.”
    • “Major issues that need fixing: optimization - severe FPS lag occurs when using multiple powers (bounce shot, explosion, electric shock, etc.).”
    • “Needs better optimization to handle multiple graphics on screen; I had to stop because it crashed on me.”
    • “The downside of this is that the game is terribly optimized and I cannot drop the quality (the buttons won't work), so I get 1 frame every 2 minutes if I end up being too strong in any level.”
    • “You get to a point where the game drops to like 1 frame a second because it's not optimized.”
    • “Major issues that need fixing: - optimization: severe fps lag occurs when using multiple powers (bounce shot, explosion, electric shock, etc.).”
  • grinding
    9 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The grinding aspect of the game receives mixed reviews, with many players finding it tedious due to the restrictive energy system that limits playtime and encourages monetization. While some enjoy the slow, steady progress and resource farming, others feel that the game becomes overly grindy and frustrating, especially when glitches hinder gameplay. Overall, the potential for fun is overshadowed by the developers' monetization strategies, making it difficult to fully enjoy the grinding experience without spending money.

    • “Don't waste your time on this game; it has an energy system with a low amount of time to play. The game loop is extremely short, and the main gameplay is grinding, but it doesn't even want you to play. It has ads to restore energy, but they only restore 2, and you can only watch 2 ads per day, so that's only 4 free energy. The rest you have to wait for or pay money, all just to play repeated gameplay.”
    • “The whole energy system just makes the game much more tedious to play.”
    • “Game could be a lot of fun as a grinding game, but developers are greedy.”
  • music
    3 mentions Positive Neutral Negative

    The music aspect of the game is heavily criticized, with users noting a lack of music and incomplete sound design. Many feel that the absence of even basic audio elements detracts from the experience, and the overwhelming presence of ads further diminishes enjoyment. Overall, the game's audio is described as subpar and frustrating.

    • “There's not even music, barely any sound.”
    • “Sounds are not even complete; the developers couldn't even use some free, no copyright or royalty-free music.”
    • “Trash game with trash ads and trash music.”
Skip Game Offers

Buy Age Breakers

24h Median play time
24h Average play time
24-24h Spent by most gamers
*Based on 1 analyzed playthroughs
Skip Games Like Age Breakers

Games Like Age Breakers

Fortress Merge: Puzzle Defense ImageFortress Merge: Puzzle Defense ImageFortress Merge: Puzzle Defense Image
Cell Survivor ImageCell Survivor ImageCell Survivor Image
Zombie Waves ImageZombie Waves ImageZombie Waves Image
Hero Squad! ImageHero Squad! ImageHero Squad! Image
Pocket Champs: 3D Racing Games ImagePocket Champs: 3D Racing Games ImagePocket Champs: 3D Racing Games Image
Skip FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Age Breakers is a platformer game.

Age Breakers is available on Phone and Tablet.

On average players spend around 24 hours playing Age Breakers.

Age Breakers was developed by Rollic Games.

Age Breakers has received negative reviews from players. Most players liked this game for its gameplay but disliked it for its monetization.

Age Breakers is a single player game.

Similar games include Fortress Merge: Puzzle Defense, Cell Survivor, Zombie Waves, Hero Squad!, Pocket Champs: 3D Racing Games and others.