270 | Two Seventy US Election | Game Brain

270 | Two Seventy US Election Game Cover

About

"270 | Two Seventy US Election" is a strategic game where you run for the presidency, aiming to win 270 electoral votes. You must make informed decisions on campaign spending and targeting geographic and special interest groups in various states to secure victory. The game offers a subscription for access to all characters, allowing you to customize your political journey.

Genres & Tags

Play Modes

Local Multi-Player Play with friends in the same physical space using split-screen or multiple screens
2-Players Play with one other player, either online or locally, in a cooperative or competitive game mode
Multi-Player Compete or cooperate with other players online
Single-Player Play through the game's story or campaign solo
PvP Player versus Player - Fight against other players in real-time, often in arena-style combat
Split Screen Play with multiple players on the same screen, often with divided or shared screen real estate

270 | Two Seventy US Election screenshot

84%

Audience ScoreBased on 812 reviews

gameplay17 positive mentions

monetization14 negative mentions

Engaging and fun gameplay that combines strategy with political themes, making it enjoyable to play with friends.
The game is free to play, providing a good entry point for those interested in political strategy without financial commitment.
Offers a unique experience with various candidates and strategies, allowing for different gameplay styles and outcomes.

Heavily reliant on microtransactions, with many features and characters locked behind paywalls, making it feel like a cash grab.
The AI is often predictable and easy to beat, leading to a lack of challenge in single-player modes.
Multiplayer functionality is poorly designed, requiring email invites which can be cumbersome and frustrating for players.

gameplay
49 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
35%
55%
10%
The gameplay of the game is characterized by its simplicity and ease of understanding, making it accessible for newcomers, but it often lacks depth and realism, leading to repetitive experiences. While some players appreciate the strategic elements and educational aspects, many express frustration over the pay-to-win mechanics and the limited content available without additional purchases. Overall, the core mechanics are seen as solid but underwhelming due to outdated updates and a lack of engaging variety.
- “Its engaging gameplay and educational aspect outshine its competitors, despite the simplistic graphics.”
- “The gameplay is simple enough to learn but is difficult to master, which I think is ideal in a game.”
- “This is a great game with mechanics that are simple to grasp yet still offer a huge number of strategies and outcomes!”
- “The main game hasn't been updated in years, which, considering how basic the mechanics are, is honestly disappointing.”
- “Gameplay is generic and fine for pass and play + online, but it is built to take your money. If you want complex AI, you have to spend $2; if you want a different game mode, candidate, vice president, or debate system, you will have to pay real money for them when they should just be in the game.”
- “The mechanics are poor, the character traits are ridiculously inaccurate to the people they represent, there is no political strategy required (just pay off states and groups), a tragic embarrassment to real game developers.”
monetization
42 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
7%
60%
33%
The monetization strategy of the game has been widely criticized for its excessive reliance on microtransactions and ads, which many players find overwhelming and frustrating. While some updates have addressed player concerns by removing ads and offering free content, the overall sentiment is that the game feels like a cash grab, with numerous in-app purchases that detract from the gameplay experience. Despite being free to play, the monetization model has led to a perception of the game as pay-to-win, leaving many players dissatisfied.
- “It's a fun game and makes you really have to think, but the in-app purchases are outrageous.”
- “The game is good for a free game, but wow, the monetization is over the top.”
- “Very cool game, could use more music variety and less microtransactions, but for a free game, it's very well made.”
- “The main problem with this game is the insanity of its monetization scheme.”
- “It's frustrating, and what could have been a fun political strategy game ends up feeling like nothing more than a cash grab.”
- “This is just a mobile-style microtransaction cash grab and it's really not worth spending your time on, let alone your money.”
graphics
12 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
50%
25%
The graphics of the game are generally described as simplistic and inconsistent, with some users criticizing the art style and user interface as clumsy and unattractive. However, a few reviews highlight a beautiful art style that enhances the overall experience, suggesting that while the graphics may not be cutting-edge, they can still contribute positively to gameplay. Overall, the visuals seem to be a mixed bag, with some players appreciating the aesthetic while others find it lacking compared to competitors.
- “The graphics absolutely outclass games such as The Witcher, and I haven't seen such good gameplay since Metal Gear Solid.”
- “The art style on the candidates and the fitting music makes for a very pleasing experience.”
- “Simple in graphics and design, yet you still need to be strategic in how you play.”
- “It looks hideous, has a wildly inconsistent art style, and the clumsiest UI in the universe.”
- “It lacks the graphical prowess of similar titles, but it compensates with a compelling, albeit niche, gameplay and a captivating atmosphere.”
- “Secondly, it needs graphics settings such as fullscreen and vsync.”
music
11 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
27%
45%
27%
The music in the game has received mixed reviews; while some players enjoy the soundtrack and find it engaging enough to listen to for extended periods, others criticize its repetitiveness and the lack of volume control options. Many users suggest that the music is too loud upon startup and would benefit from a more user-friendly interface that includes a volume slider. Overall, the music complements the game's art style but could use more variety to enhance the experience.
- “I sat on the menu screen for like 20 hours on election day just listening to the music, before, during, and after the votes were counted lol”
- “I like the game, it's a fun strategy styled game similar to games such as Risk, with a decent soundtrack as well.”
- “The art style on the candidates and the fitting music makes for a very pleasing experience.”
- “It's mostly put together well but loops the same music over and over.”
- “It takes 30 minutes to load and I have to sit through the annoying music for 30 minutes without knowing how to mute the game.”
- “There are no shortcut keys; the sound/music is either on or off.”
humor
8 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The humor in the game is largely centered around political satire, with players finding enjoyment in creating amusing election scenarios and character combinations, such as Trump and Bernie. The concept of "buying candidates" adds a layer of hidden humor, while the community's reactions contribute to the overall comedic experience.
- “This game is fun if you want to create political scenarios and have enjoyment in making funny elections.”
- “I particularly enjoy the hidden humor behind the notion of 'buying candidates' to play (though I haven't tried that yet, myself).”
- “Funny Bernie and Ben Shapiro combo always wins!”
stability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game's stability is frequently criticized, with users reporting numerous bugs, glitches, and issues that require multiple restarts to resolve. While some players find it manageable, the overall consensus suggests that the game's performance is inconsistent and can lead to frustrating experiences.
- “Has some issues sometimes where it won't start/load properly unless relaunched once or twice, occasionally glitches out system audio and pins a CPU to 100% for a minute for some unknown reason, but overall alright.”
- “So many glitches; a game you have to keep restarting just is not worth your time.”
- “Although 270 is a free game, I don't know if it is a game that you should play. The game is repetitive, slow, buggy, and many times it can be boring.”
replayability
5 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
40%
60%
Overall, the game's replayability is mixed; while some players find it engaging with dynamic gameplay and significant replay value, others feel it lacks depth and variety, leading to a lack of incentive to return after initial playthroughs.
- “A very simple but very engaging game with a ton of replayability and moments of excitement.”
- “Dynamic gameplay, lots of replay value.”
- “Overall, I'd say it's a meh game, but it has almost no replay value.”
- “The game is fun, which earns a recommendation, but replayability is a problem, sadly.”
- “The money grab is a bit annoying, but it seems like some more playable characters have been released for free, and what character you use doesn't have too massive of an impact.”
story
4 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
25%
75%
The story is perceived as a dystopian narrative centered around the concept of making Bernie Sanders president, which adds a satirical and critical layer to the game's plot. However, some users question the depth and coherence of the overall story.
- “I mean... making Bernie Sanders president is its own dystopian story.”
- “story?”
- “main story: --”
optimization
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
The game is considered fun, but it suffers from significant optimization issues, leading to slow performance. Players find the AI lacking in challenge, as they can easily defeat it using the same strategies employed against easier opponents.
- “Fun game, but very poorly optimized.”
- “Honestly, running slowly wouldn't bother me as much if the AI was actually challenging... but I can still beat the AI very easily using the same exact strategy I used with easy AI.”
grinding
2 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
100%
Players find the grinding aspect of the game tedious, often requiring excessive time investment, particularly due to the prevalence of players going AFK during matches, which disrupts the experience.
- “Grinding in this game is incredibly rewarding and keeps you engaged.”
- “The grind is challenging but satisfying, making every achievement feel earned.”
- “You'll need a second life for grinding.”
- “Half of my experience has been filled with people going AFK, making matches tedious to go through.”
atmosphere
1 mentions Positive Neutral Negative
100%
300%
The atmosphere of the game is described as captivating and engaging, effectively compensating for its lack of advanced graphics. While it may appeal to a niche audience, it successfully creates an immersive experience through its gameplay.
- “It lacks the graphical prowess of similar titles, but it compensates with a compelling, albeit niche, gameplay and a captivating atmosphere.”
- “The atmosphere feels flat and uninspired, failing to immerse players in the game world.”
- “Despite some interesting concepts, the overall ambiance is dull and lacks the depth needed to engage players.”
- “The game tries to create a unique atmosphere, but it ultimately falls short, leaving players feeling disconnected.”